Hampshire County Council
Councillors:
78
Wards:
76
Committees:
49
Meetings (2026):
57
Meetings (2025):
155
Meeting
Regulatory Committee - Hampshire
Meeting Times
Scheduled Time
Start:
Wednesday, 9th July 2025
10:00 AM
Wednesday, 9th July 2025
10:00 AM
End:
Wednesday, 9th July 2025
2:00 PM
Wednesday, 9th July 2025
2:00 PM
Meeting Status
Status:
Confirmed
Confirmed
Date:
09 Jul 2025
09 Jul 2025
Location:
Ashburton Hall, Elizabeth II Court, The Castle, Winchester
Ashburton Hall, Elizabeth II Court, The Castle, Winchester
Meeting Attendees
Committee Member
Chairman of the Council
Independent Group Deputy
Vice Chairman of the Council
Liberal Democrats Deputy
Liberal Democrats Spokesperson
Agenda
1
Apologies for absence
To receive any apologies for absence received.
Minutes
Apologies were noted from Cllrs M Cooper and Price. Cllrs Harrison and Irish were present as the Liberal Democrat deputees.
2
Declarations of interest
All Members who believe they have a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest in any matter to be considered at the meeting must declare that interest and, having regard to Part 3 Paragraph 1.5 of the County Council's Members’ Code of Conduct, leave the meeting while the matter is discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with Paragraph 1.6 of the Code. Furthermore all Members with a Personal Interest in a matter being considered at the meeting should consider, having regard to Part 5, Paragraph 4 of the Code, whether such interest should be declared, and having regard to Part 5, Paragraph 5 of the Code, consider whether it is appropriate to leave the meeting while the matter is discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with the Code.
Minutes
Members were mindful that where they believed they had a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest in any matter considered at the meeting they must declare that interest at the time of the relevant debate and, having regard to the circumstances described in Part 3, Paragraph 1.5 of the County Council's Members' Code of Conduct, leave the meeting while the matter was discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with Paragraph 1.6 of the Code. Furthermore Members were mindful that where they believed they had a Non-Pecuniary interest in a matter being considered at the meeting they considered whether such interest should be declared, and having regard to Part 5, Paragraph 2 of the Code, considered whether it was appropriate to leave the meeting whilst the matter was discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with the Code.
3
Minutes of previous meeting
To confirm the minutes of the previous meeting.
Attachments:
- Document Minutes of Previous Meeting 01 Jul 2025
Minutes
The minutes of the last meeting were reviewed and agreed.
4
Deputations
Deputations are taken at the relevant item in which they apply.
Minutes
It was confirmed that three deputations had been received for item 6 on the agenda. In addition, a written deputation had been received for Cllr Wallace who was not able to attend.
In addition a further two deputations have been received for item 7 on the agenda.
The Chairman confirmed that these would be heard during the relevant item and that each deputation had up to ten minutes to speak in accordance with Standing Orders.
In addition a further two deputations have been received for item 7 on the agenda.
The Chairman confirmed that these would be heard during the relevant item and that each deputation had up to ten minutes to speak in accordance with Standing Orders.
5
Chairman's Announcements
To receive any announcements the Chairman may wish to make.
Minutes
The Chairman made no announcements.
6
Shedfield Equestrian Centre, Lockhams Recycling Ltd, Botley Road. Shedfield
To consider a report from the Director of Universal Services regarding retrospective planning application for the change of use to open storage of recycled aggregate materials; the retention of ancillary office, workshop and hardstanding; and associated works at Shedfield Equestrian Centre.
Attachments:
- Document Report and Conditions 01 Jul 2025
- Document Lockhams Appendix B 01 Jul 2025
- Document Lockhams Appendix C 01 Jul 2025
- Document Lockhams Appendix D 01 Jul 2025
- Document Lockhams Appendix E 01 Jul 2025
- Document Lockhams Appendix F 01 Jul 2025
- Document Item 6 & 7 - Update Report 01 Jul 2025
Minutes
REVISED APPLICATION - Retrospective planning application for the change of use to open storage of recycled aggregate materials; the retention of ancillary office, workshop and hardstanding; and associated works at Shedfield Equestrian Centre, Lockhams Recycling Ltd, Botley Road. Shedfield Hampshire SO32 2HN (No. 24/00807/HCS) WR228
The Committee received a report from the Director of Universal Services concerning a planning application seeking retrospective planning permission for the open storage of recycled aggregate materials and the retention of ancillary office and workshop and associated works. This application followed the refusal of planning application 22/02015/HCS on 24 January 2024 for the same proposal at the application site. It also followed the deferral of this item from the October 2024 Regulatory Committee.
Officers summarised the report, sharing details of the location of the site alongside site plans, photos of the area and details of consultations and representations. Officers noted that objections had been received from Winchester City Council and Shedfield Parish Council.
Deputations were received from a local resident, Joanna Harvey, Cllr Vivian Achwal from Winchester City Council and Francesca Byrne and Ian Donohue from Shedfield Parish Council and Southern Planning Practice (respectively) in opposition to the recommendation to the committee. In addition, a written submission from Councillor Malcolm Wallace, was read in opposition to the recommendation.
During questions to officers, it was clarified that:
· This application for storage was separate to the neighbouring area currently in use as a waste recycling site, which benefits from a Certificate of Lawful Existing Use or Development (CLEUD). Officers noted that no restrictions could be provided relating to this site as part of this application and they could not form part of the decision making process for the current application.
· Neither the Environment Agency not Winchester City Council’s Environmental Health Officer (EHO) had any concerns or objections in relation to noise or dust/air quality emissions. The EHO had recommended conditions controlling noise and dust suppression be imposed as well as one restricting operating hours too, should permission be granted.
· Despite suggestions, there appears to have been no current liaison between the applicant and the local community.
During debate, members raised concerns relating to the location and need of the site. Members also noted the enforcement actions undertaken by the City Council on wider planning matter at the site. The lack of liaison with the community was highlighted, however it was noted that this could not impact or be a material consideration of the decision taken. The issues raised in relation to the health impact of local residents was also discussed.
Following a summary, the Chairman moved to the recommendations. Cllr Taylor proposed an additional condition as set out below, which was seconded by Cllr Withers and unanimously agreed to form part of the substantive recommendation.
‘No vehicle shall leave the site unless its wheels and chassis have been cleaned sufficiently to prevent mud being carried onto the highway. All HGVs vehicles shall be sheeted to prevent material being spilt onto the road.’
The reason provided for this was in the interest of highway safety and to ensure the development is in accordance with Policy 12 (Managing traffic) of the Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan (2013).
Cllr Parker then proposed an amendment to Condition 16 as set out below, which was seconded by Cllr Meenaghan and unanimously agreed to form part of the substantive recommendation.
‘Not later than three months following the grant of planning permission, a plan detailing methods for the removal of all waste materials or products, the removal of all buildings, fencing, plant, machinery, structures and equipment (required to undertake permitted operations) and details on how the site would be restored to its original condition or to a condition acceptable to the Minerals and Waste Planning Authority should be submitted to the Minerals and Waste Planning Authority for written approval. Once approved, the plan shall be implemented in full within three months of the permitted use ceasing.
No vehicle shall leave the site unless its wheels and chassis have been cleaned sufficiently to prevent mud being carried onto the highway. All HGVs vehicles shall be sheeted to prevent material being spilt onto the road.’
The reason provided for this was in the interest of highway safety and to ensure the development is in accordance with Policy 12 (Managing traffic) of the Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan (2013).
The amended recommendation was then voted on with the following outcome:
Favour: 7
Against: 9
Abstentions: 0
Members then provided their reasons to Officers for the refusal as set out below, and agreed these reasons by a vote with the following outcome:
Favour: 11
Against: 2
Abstentions: 3
RESOLVED:
That planning permission be REFUSED due to the following reasons:
1. On the basis of the information submitted, the location of the proposal has not been adequately justified in terms of its demonstrable market need for being located in this countryside location, and is contrary to the requirements of Policies 5 (Protection of the countryside) and 29 (Location of waste management development) of the Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan (2013), Policy MTRA4 (Development in the Countryside) of the Winchester City Council Local Plan Part 1 – Joint Core Strategy (2013)) and Policy DM10 (Essential Facilities and Services in the Countryside) of Winchester City Council Local Plan Part 2 (2017);
2. It is considered that the proposal is likely to result in an unacceptable impact on the character of this rural locality, and is contrary to the requirements of Policies 5 (Protection of the countryside), 10 (d) (Protecting public health, safety and amenity) and 13 (High quality design of minerals and waste development) of the Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan (2013), Policy CP13 (High Quality Design) of the Winchester City Council Local Plan Part 1 – Joint Core Strategy (2013) and Policy DM23 (Rural Character) of the Winchester City Council Local Plan Part 2 (2017).
The Committee received a report from the Director of Universal Services concerning a planning application seeking retrospective planning permission for the open storage of recycled aggregate materials and the retention of ancillary office and workshop and associated works. This application followed the refusal of planning application 22/02015/HCS on 24 January 2024 for the same proposal at the application site. It also followed the deferral of this item from the October 2024 Regulatory Committee.
Officers summarised the report, sharing details of the location of the site alongside site plans, photos of the area and details of consultations and representations. Officers noted that objections had been received from Winchester City Council and Shedfield Parish Council.
Deputations were received from a local resident, Joanna Harvey, Cllr Vivian Achwal from Winchester City Council and Francesca Byrne and Ian Donohue from Shedfield Parish Council and Southern Planning Practice (respectively) in opposition to the recommendation to the committee. In addition, a written submission from Councillor Malcolm Wallace, was read in opposition to the recommendation.
During questions to officers, it was clarified that:
· This application for storage was separate to the neighbouring area currently in use as a waste recycling site, which benefits from a Certificate of Lawful Existing Use or Development (CLEUD). Officers noted that no restrictions could be provided relating to this site as part of this application and they could not form part of the decision making process for the current application.
· Neither the Environment Agency not Winchester City Council’s Environmental Health Officer (EHO) had any concerns or objections in relation to noise or dust/air quality emissions. The EHO had recommended conditions controlling noise and dust suppression be imposed as well as one restricting operating hours too, should permission be granted.
· Despite suggestions, there appears to have been no current liaison between the applicant and the local community.
During debate, members raised concerns relating to the location and need of the site. Members also noted the enforcement actions undertaken by the City Council on wider planning matter at the site. The lack of liaison with the community was highlighted, however it was noted that this could not impact or be a material consideration of the decision taken. The issues raised in relation to the health impact of local residents was also discussed.
Following a summary, the Chairman moved to the recommendations. Cllr Taylor proposed an additional condition as set out below, which was seconded by Cllr Withers and unanimously agreed to form part of the substantive recommendation.
‘No vehicle shall leave the site unless its wheels and chassis have been cleaned sufficiently to prevent mud being carried onto the highway. All HGVs vehicles shall be sheeted to prevent material being spilt onto the road.’
The reason provided for this was in the interest of highway safety and to ensure the development is in accordance with Policy 12 (Managing traffic) of the Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan (2013).
Cllr Parker then proposed an amendment to Condition 16 as set out below, which was seconded by Cllr Meenaghan and unanimously agreed to form part of the substantive recommendation.
‘Not later than three months following the grant of planning permission, a plan detailing methods for the removal of all waste materials or products, the removal of all buildings, fencing, plant, machinery, structures and equipment (required to undertake permitted operations) and details on how the site would be restored to its original condition or to a condition acceptable to the Minerals and Waste Planning Authority should be submitted to the Minerals and Waste Planning Authority for written approval. Once approved, the plan shall be implemented in full within three months of the permitted use ceasing.
No vehicle shall leave the site unless its wheels and chassis have been cleaned sufficiently to prevent mud being carried onto the highway. All HGVs vehicles shall be sheeted to prevent material being spilt onto the road.’
The reason provided for this was in the interest of highway safety and to ensure the development is in accordance with Policy 12 (Managing traffic) of the Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan (2013).
The amended recommendation was then voted on with the following outcome:
Favour: 7
Against: 9
Abstentions: 0
Members then provided their reasons to Officers for the refusal as set out below, and agreed these reasons by a vote with the following outcome:
Favour: 11
Against: 2
Abstentions: 3
RESOLVED:
That planning permission be REFUSED due to the following reasons:
1. On the basis of the information submitted, the location of the proposal has not been adequately justified in terms of its demonstrable market need for being located in this countryside location, and is contrary to the requirements of Policies 5 (Protection of the countryside) and 29 (Location of waste management development) of the Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan (2013), Policy MTRA4 (Development in the Countryside) of the Winchester City Council Local Plan Part 1 – Joint Core Strategy (2013)) and Policy DM10 (Essential Facilities and Services in the Countryside) of Winchester City Council Local Plan Part 2 (2017);
2. It is considered that the proposal is likely to result in an unacceptable impact on the character of this rural locality, and is contrary to the requirements of Policies 5 (Protection of the countryside), 10 (d) (Protecting public health, safety and amenity) and 13 (High quality design of minerals and waste development) of the Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan (2013), Policy CP13 (High Quality Design) of the Winchester City Council Local Plan Part 1 – Joint Core Strategy (2013) and Policy DM23 (Rural Character) of the Winchester City Council Local Plan Part 2 (2017).
7
Humbly Grove Oilfield, Weston Common, The Avenue, Lasham
To consider a report from the Director or Universal Services, which details varations to conditions at Humbly Grove Oilfield, Weston Common, The Avenue, Lasham.
Attachments:
- Document Report 01 Jul 2025
- Document Appendix A - Conditions 01 Jul 2025
- Document Humbly Appendix B1 01 Jul 2025
- Document Humbly Appendix B2 01 Jul 2025
- Document Humbly Appendix B3 01 Jul 2025
- Document Humbly Appendix C Location Plan 01 Jul 2025
- Document Humbly Appendix D 01 Jul 2025
- Document Humbly Appendix E 01 Jul 2025
- Document Humbly Appendix F 01 Jul 2025
- Document Humbly Appendix G 01 Jul 2025
- Document Humbly Appendix H 01 Jul 2025
- Document Humbly Appendix I 01 Jul 2025
- Document Item 6 & 7 - Update Report 01 Jul 2025
Minutes
Variation of Conditions 13 (Noise monitoring scheme) and 15 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission BDB/64542 (Application No. 24/02595/CMA Site Ref: BA057);
Variation of Conditions 2 (Hours of working) and 3 (Restoration) of Planning Permission 17/00289/CMA (Application No. 24/02596/CMA Site Ref: BA057);
Variation of Conditions 1 (Exportation of oil by tanker) and 17 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission 17/01917/CMA (Application No. 24/02597/CMA Site Ref BA057);
Variation of Conditions 9 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) and 14 (Noise monitoring procedure) of Planning Permission BDB/55931 (Application No. 24/02598/CMA Site Ref BA057);
Variation of Conditions 2 (Removal of the gas turbine electrical generator units), 3 (Noise suppression scheme) and 6 (External wall paint colour) of Planning Permission BDB48339 (Application No. 24/02599/CMA Site Ref BA057);
Variation of Conditions 2 (External materials) and 3 (Cessation of the use and removal of post control building) of Planning Permission BDB/68298 (Application No. 24/02600/CMA Site Ref. BA057);
Variation of Conditions 1 (Exportation of oil by tanker) and 17 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission 17/01340/HCC (Application No. 24/02252/HCC Site Ref: HR073);
Variation of Conditions 2 (Retention of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) and 11 (Vehicular parking and turning) of Planning Permission 11/01156/CMA (Application No. 24/02254/HCC Site Ref. HR073);
Variation of Conditions 1 (Exportation of oil by tanker) and 17 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission 26326/014 (Application No. 26326/019 Site Ref EH133);
Variation of Conditions 26 (Restoration), 2 (Siting, design, external appearance and access to above ground structures, discharged on 14.04.2005), Condition 21 (noise monitoring scheme, discharged on 14.04.2005) and the removal of discharged pre-commencement Conditions 1 (Submission of method of working), 23 and 24 (Bat investigation) and 25 (Written archaeological scheme of investigation) of Planning Permission RFBZ/001/0031C. (Application No 24/02610/CMA Site Ref. BA180); No 26326/020 Site Ref. EH176; 24/02643/CMAN Site Ref. TV266; 24/02611/CMA Site Ref: BA057); and Installation of a new oil storage tank (Application No 24/02611/CMA Site Ref: BA057)
at / connected with Humbly Grove Oilfield, Weston Common, The
Avenue, Lasham, Hampshire GU34 5SY
The Committee received a report from the Director of Universal Services concerning 11 separate planning applications. 10 of which were for the variation and/or removal of the conditions on previous temporary permissions to enable the continued use of the site for oil extraction and storage, alongside other ancillary operations. The additional application sought approval for the installation of a new oil storage tank within the main Humbly Grove operational site.
Officers summarised the report, sharing details of the location of the site alongside site plans, aerial photos of the area and details of consultations and representations. Officers also noted the restoration plans for 2055.
Deputations were received from the applicant and Cllr Kemp-Gee in support of the recommendation to the committee.
Following a summary, the Chairman moved to the recommendations, voting on each of the eleven applications in turn. Each application was agreed unanimously.
RESOLVED:
That planning permission is GRANTED for planning applications:
· 24/02595/CMA (Variation of Conditions 13 (Noise monitoring scheme) and 15 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission BDB/64542;
· 24/02596/CMA (Variation of Conditions 2 (Hours of working) and 3 (Restoration) of Planning Permission 17/00289/CMA);
· 24/02252/HCC (Variation of Conditions 1 (Exportation of oil by tanker) and 17 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission 17/01340/HCC);
· 24/02597/CMA (Variation of Conditions 1 (Exportation of oil by tanker) and 17 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission 17/01917/CMA);
· 24/02598/CMA (Variation of Conditions 9 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) and 14 (Noise monitoring procedure) of Planning Permission BDB/55931);
· 24/02599/CMA (Variation of Conditions 2 (Removal of the gas turbine electrical generator units), 3 (Noise suppression scheme) and 6 (External wall paint colour) of Planning Permission BDB48339;
· 26326/019 (Variation of Conditions 1 (Exportation of oil by tanker) and 17 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission 26326/014);
· 24/02600/CMA (Variation of Conditions 2 (External materials) and 3 (Cessation of the use and removal of post control building) of Planning Permission BDB/68298);
· 24/02254/HCC (Variation of Conditions 2 (Retention of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) and 11 (Vehicular parking and turning) of Planning Permission 11/01156/CMA);
· 24/02610/CMA (BDBC reference), 26326/020 (EHDC), 24/02643/CMAN (TVBC) & 24/02758/HCM (WCC) (Variation of Conditions 26 (Restoration), 2 (Siting, design, external appearance and access to above ground structures, discharged on 14.04.2005), Condition 21 (noise monitoring scheme, discharged on 14.04.2005) and the removal of discharged pre-commencement Conditions 1 (Submission of method of working), 23 and 24 (Bat investigation) and 25 (Written archaeological scheme of investigation) of Planning Permission RFBZ/001/0031C); and
· 24/02611/CMA (Installation of a new oil storage tank at Weston Common, Humbly Grove Oilfield).
Subject to the conditions listed in Appendices A1 to A11 of the decision report.
Variation of Conditions 2 (Hours of working) and 3 (Restoration) of Planning Permission 17/00289/CMA (Application No. 24/02596/CMA Site Ref: BA057);
Variation of Conditions 1 (Exportation of oil by tanker) and 17 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission 17/01917/CMA (Application No. 24/02597/CMA Site Ref BA057);
Variation of Conditions 9 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) and 14 (Noise monitoring procedure) of Planning Permission BDB/55931 (Application No. 24/02598/CMA Site Ref BA057);
Variation of Conditions 2 (Removal of the gas turbine electrical generator units), 3 (Noise suppression scheme) and 6 (External wall paint colour) of Planning Permission BDB48339 (Application No. 24/02599/CMA Site Ref BA057);
Variation of Conditions 2 (External materials) and 3 (Cessation of the use and removal of post control building) of Planning Permission BDB/68298 (Application No. 24/02600/CMA Site Ref. BA057);
Variation of Conditions 1 (Exportation of oil by tanker) and 17 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission 17/01340/HCC (Application No. 24/02252/HCC Site Ref: HR073);
Variation of Conditions 2 (Retention of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) and 11 (Vehicular parking and turning) of Planning Permission 11/01156/CMA (Application No. 24/02254/HCC Site Ref. HR073);
Variation of Conditions 1 (Exportation of oil by tanker) and 17 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission 26326/014 (Application No. 26326/019 Site Ref EH133);
Variation of Conditions 26 (Restoration), 2 (Siting, design, external appearance and access to above ground structures, discharged on 14.04.2005), Condition 21 (noise monitoring scheme, discharged on 14.04.2005) and the removal of discharged pre-commencement Conditions 1 (Submission of method of working), 23 and 24 (Bat investigation) and 25 (Written archaeological scheme of investigation) of Planning Permission RFBZ/001/0031C. (Application No 24/02610/CMA Site Ref. BA180); No 26326/020 Site Ref. EH176; 24/02643/CMAN Site Ref. TV266; 24/02611/CMA Site Ref: BA057); and Installation of a new oil storage tank (Application No 24/02611/CMA Site Ref: BA057)
at / connected with Humbly Grove Oilfield, Weston Common, The
Avenue, Lasham, Hampshire GU34 5SY
The Committee received a report from the Director of Universal Services concerning 11 separate planning applications. 10 of which were for the variation and/or removal of the conditions on previous temporary permissions to enable the continued use of the site for oil extraction and storage, alongside other ancillary operations. The additional application sought approval for the installation of a new oil storage tank within the main Humbly Grove operational site.
Officers summarised the report, sharing details of the location of the site alongside site plans, aerial photos of the area and details of consultations and representations. Officers also noted the restoration plans for 2055.
Deputations were received from the applicant and Cllr Kemp-Gee in support of the recommendation to the committee.
Following a summary, the Chairman moved to the recommendations, voting on each of the eleven applications in turn. Each application was agreed unanimously.
RESOLVED:
That planning permission is GRANTED for planning applications:
· 24/02595/CMA (Variation of Conditions 13 (Noise monitoring scheme) and 15 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission BDB/64542;
· 24/02596/CMA (Variation of Conditions 2 (Hours of working) and 3 (Restoration) of Planning Permission 17/00289/CMA);
· 24/02252/HCC (Variation of Conditions 1 (Exportation of oil by tanker) and 17 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission 17/01340/HCC);
· 24/02597/CMA (Variation of Conditions 1 (Exportation of oil by tanker) and 17 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission 17/01917/CMA);
· 24/02598/CMA (Variation of Conditions 9 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) and 14 (Noise monitoring procedure) of Planning Permission BDB/55931);
· 24/02599/CMA (Variation of Conditions 2 (Removal of the gas turbine electrical generator units), 3 (Noise suppression scheme) and 6 (External wall paint colour) of Planning Permission BDB48339;
· 26326/019 (Variation of Conditions 1 (Exportation of oil by tanker) and 17 (Removal of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) of Planning Permission 26326/014);
· 24/02600/CMA (Variation of Conditions 2 (External materials) and 3 (Cessation of the use and removal of post control building) of Planning Permission BDB/68298);
· 24/02254/HCC (Variation of Conditions 2 (Retention of plant, buildings, structures, hard standings and haul roads) and 11 (Vehicular parking and turning) of Planning Permission 11/01156/CMA);
· 24/02610/CMA (BDBC reference), 26326/020 (EHDC), 24/02643/CMAN (TVBC) & 24/02758/HCM (WCC) (Variation of Conditions 26 (Restoration), 2 (Siting, design, external appearance and access to above ground structures, discharged on 14.04.2005), Condition 21 (noise monitoring scheme, discharged on 14.04.2005) and the removal of discharged pre-commencement Conditions 1 (Submission of method of working), 23 and 24 (Bat investigation) and 25 (Written archaeological scheme of investigation) of Planning Permission RFBZ/001/0031C); and
· 24/02611/CMA (Installation of a new oil storage tank at Weston Common, Humbly Grove Oilfield).
Subject to the conditions listed in Appendices A1 to A11 of the decision report.
8
Monitoring and Enforcement Update
To receive a report from the Director of Universal Services, which provides information to the Regulatory Committee on the Monitoring and Enforcement work undertaken by the Development Management team (including monitoring and enforcement) Planning during the period March 2025 – May 2025.
Attachments:
- Document Report 01 Jul 2025
Minutes
The Committee received a Monitoring and Enforcement report from the Director of Universal Services, which summarised work undertaken by the Development Management team (including monitoring and enforcement) during the period March 2025 – May 2025.
RESOLVED:
That the Regulatory Committee noted the contents of the report.
RESOLVED:
That the Regulatory Committee noted the contents of the report.
Previous Meetings
Future Meetings
Join the Discussion
You need to be signed in to comment.
Sign in