Hampshire County Council
Councillors:
78
Wards:
76
Committees:
49
Meetings (2026):
57
Meetings (2025):
155
Meeting
County Council - Hampshire
Meeting Times
Scheduled Time
Start:
Thursday, 27th November 2025
10:15 AM
Thursday, 27th November 2025
10:15 AM
End:
Thursday, 27th November 2025
2:15 PM
Thursday, 27th November 2025
2:15 PM
Meeting Status
Status:
Confirmed
Confirmed
Date:
27 Nov 2025
27 Nov 2025
Location:
Council Chamber - HCC
Council Chamber - HCC
Meeting Attendees
Committee Member
Vice-Chairman
Chairman of the Council
Committee Member
Leader of the Council
Committee Member
Vice Chairman of the Council
Agenda
0
On-Street Parking
Minutes
The Council considered a Notice of Motion regarding On-Street Parking Charges, proposed by Councillor Wade and seconded by Councillor James, submitted in accordance with Standing Order 18.1. Cllr Wade called for a review of on-street parking charges in light of concerns raised by residents and businesses, particularly in Lymington. Members heard, during deputations earlier in the meeting, that removal of the former one?hour free parking period had resulted in reduced footfall and a decline in trade for high street businesses in Lymington.
An amendment was proposed by Councillor Drew, seconded by Councillor Broomfield, seeking a broader, collaborative review involving district and borough councils, given that the majority of parking provision fell outside the County Council’s direct control.
The amendments is set out below, with additions in bold and deletions shown in italics and struck-through:
This council notes many high street shops and businesses are struggling in the current economic climate. The numbers of empty shops on our town and village streets are rising with the resultant negative impact on their local economies.
Our communities need support to try and halt the retreating tide of movement to out of town shopping and business centres. Local people and businesses are calling for help.
The County Council undertakes on-street charging arrangements for some high street locations across the County. In such locations off-street parking, such as pay and display car parks, makes up on average well over 90% of available spaces, with the majority of these spaces owned by District and Borough Councils.
This Council can help to stem that tide andtherefore resolves to:
Engage with Districts, Borough and City Councils to review on-street parking charges imposed by the County Counciland in preparation for Local Government Reorganisation work together to consider their economic impact on local businesses, taking account of the desirability of protecting and even enhancing the high streets of Hampshire’s communities and tasks the Leader to write to all Hampshire Council Leaders to encourage joint working to identify how HCC, district, borough and city councils can respond to local need.
During debate, Members covered the economic impact on local centres, the significant variation in local circumstances across Hampshire, and differing views on whether a focused or wide?ranging review would be most effective.
Members speaking in favour of the amendment stressed that on?street parking policy was complex and varied widely across the county, with responsibility for most parking provision resting with district and borough councils. They argued that a holistic and collaborative review was therefore essential, rather than one focused on a single location. Several Members noted that research suggested parking charges were only one of many factors affecting retail performance, alongside issues such as shop quality, accessibility, and pedestrian experience. Examples were cited of towns such as Basingstoke and Winchester, where different parking approaches had produced varied outcomes, demonstrating the need for locally tailored solutions rather than a one?size?fits?all policy.
Other Members voiced concern that a broad review incorporating multiple authorities risked delaying action in areas experiencing immediate difficulties. They maintained that, while a countywide analysis might be helpful in the longer term, the evidence presented in Lymington warranted specific and prompt consideration. Supporters of the amendment argued that undertaking a review in isolation, and ahead of any future local government reorganisation, risked producing inconsistent or short?lived outcomes. The need for better alignment between county and district parking strategies, including issues relating to blue badge bays, enforcement, and the wider impact on high street vitality, was also highlighted.
Following debate, the amendment was put to the vote. A recorded vote was requested and supported by the required number of members. Due to a technical issue at the meeting the names of those voting were unable to be recorded. The outcome of the vote was as follows:
FOR: 33
AGAINST: 20
ABSTAIN: 3
The amendment was carried.
A subsequent recorded vote on the substantive recommendations, as amended, was also carried. The outcome of the vote was as follows:
FOR (33): Councillors Nick Adams-King, Lulu Bowerman, Jackie Branson, Ann Briggs, Steven Broomfield, Graham Burgess, Roz Chadd, Rod Cooper, Debbie Curnow-Ford, Tim Davies, Chris Donnelly, David Drew, Barry Dunning, Liz Fairhurst, Michael Ford, Jonathan Glen, Juliet Henderson, Zoe Huggins, Peter Latham, Keith Mans, Rob Mocatta, Kirsty North, Russell Oppenheimer, Stephen Parker, Louise Parker-Jones, Stephen Philpott, Stephen Reid, Patricia Stallard, Andy Tree, Rhydian Vaughan, Malcolm Wallace, Jan Warwick and Bill Withers.
AGAINST (12): Councillors Fran Carpenter, Tonia Craig, Alex Crawford, Alan Dowden, Keith House, Wayne Irish, Andrew Joy, Lesley Meenaghan, Jackie Porter, Elaine Still, Kim Taylor and Malcolm Wallace
ABSTAIN (8): Councillors Mark Cooper, Paula Ferguson, Tim Groves, David Harrison, Gavin James, Derek Mellor, Martin Tod and Jonathan Williams.
RESOLVED:
This Council resolves to:
Engage with Districts, Borough and City Councils to review parking charges and in preparation for Local Government Reorganisation work together to consider their economic impact on local businesses, taking account of the desirability of protecting and even enhancing the high streets of Hampshire’s communities and tasks the Leader to write to all Hampshire Council Leaders to encourage joint working to identify how the county council, district, borough and city councils can respond to local need.
An amendment was proposed by Councillor Drew, seconded by Councillor Broomfield, seeking a broader, collaborative review involving district and borough councils, given that the majority of parking provision fell outside the County Council’s direct control.
The amendments is set out below, with additions in bold and deletions shown in italics and struck-through:
This council notes many high street shops and businesses are struggling in the current economic climate. The numbers of empty shops on our town and village streets are rising with the resultant negative impact on their local economies.
Our communities need support to try and halt the retreating tide of movement to out of town shopping and business centres. Local people and businesses are calling for help.
The County Council undertakes on-street charging arrangements for some high street locations across the County. In such locations off-street parking, such as pay and display car parks, makes up on average well over 90% of available spaces, with the majority of these spaces owned by District and Borough Councils.
This Council can help to stem that tide andtherefore resolves to:
Engage with Districts, Borough and City Councils to review on-street parking charges imposed by the County Counciland in preparation for Local Government Reorganisation work together to consider their economic impact on local businesses, taking account of the desirability of protecting and even enhancing the high streets of Hampshire’s communities and tasks the Leader to write to all Hampshire Council Leaders to encourage joint working to identify how HCC, district, borough and city councils can respond to local need.
During debate, Members covered the economic impact on local centres, the significant variation in local circumstances across Hampshire, and differing views on whether a focused or wide?ranging review would be most effective.
Members speaking in favour of the amendment stressed that on?street parking policy was complex and varied widely across the county, with responsibility for most parking provision resting with district and borough councils. They argued that a holistic and collaborative review was therefore essential, rather than one focused on a single location. Several Members noted that research suggested parking charges were only one of many factors affecting retail performance, alongside issues such as shop quality, accessibility, and pedestrian experience. Examples were cited of towns such as Basingstoke and Winchester, where different parking approaches had produced varied outcomes, demonstrating the need for locally tailored solutions rather than a one?size?fits?all policy.
Other Members voiced concern that a broad review incorporating multiple authorities risked delaying action in areas experiencing immediate difficulties. They maintained that, while a countywide analysis might be helpful in the longer term, the evidence presented in Lymington warranted specific and prompt consideration. Supporters of the amendment argued that undertaking a review in isolation, and ahead of any future local government reorganisation, risked producing inconsistent or short?lived outcomes. The need for better alignment between county and district parking strategies, including issues relating to blue badge bays, enforcement, and the wider impact on high street vitality, was also highlighted.
Following debate, the amendment was put to the vote. A recorded vote was requested and supported by the required number of members. Due to a technical issue at the meeting the names of those voting were unable to be recorded. The outcome of the vote was as follows:
FOR: 33
AGAINST: 20
ABSTAIN: 3
The amendment was carried.
A subsequent recorded vote on the substantive recommendations, as amended, was also carried. The outcome of the vote was as follows:
FOR (33): Councillors Nick Adams-King, Lulu Bowerman, Jackie Branson, Ann Briggs, Steven Broomfield, Graham Burgess, Roz Chadd, Rod Cooper, Debbie Curnow-Ford, Tim Davies, Chris Donnelly, David Drew, Barry Dunning, Liz Fairhurst, Michael Ford, Jonathan Glen, Juliet Henderson, Zoe Huggins, Peter Latham, Keith Mans, Rob Mocatta, Kirsty North, Russell Oppenheimer, Stephen Parker, Louise Parker-Jones, Stephen Philpott, Stephen Reid, Patricia Stallard, Andy Tree, Rhydian Vaughan, Malcolm Wallace, Jan Warwick and Bill Withers.
AGAINST (12): Councillors Fran Carpenter, Tonia Craig, Alex Crawford, Alan Dowden, Keith House, Wayne Irish, Andrew Joy, Lesley Meenaghan, Jackie Porter, Elaine Still, Kim Taylor and Malcolm Wallace
ABSTAIN (8): Councillors Mark Cooper, Paula Ferguson, Tim Groves, David Harrison, Gavin James, Derek Mellor, Martin Tod and Jonathan Williams.
RESOLVED:
This Council resolves to:
Engage with Districts, Borough and City Councils to review parking charges and in preparation for Local Government Reorganisation work together to consider their economic impact on local businesses, taking account of the desirability of protecting and even enhancing the high streets of Hampshire’s communities and tasks the Leader to write to all Hampshire Council Leaders to encourage joint working to identify how the county council, district, borough and city councils can respond to local need.
0
The Meeting closed at 2.00pm
Minutes
0
Protecting our National Landscapes
Minutes
The Council considered a Notion of Motion on Protecting National Landscapes, proposed by Councillor Henderson and seconded by Councillor Mocatta, submitted in accordance with Standing Order 18.1, concerning the protection of Hampshire’s nationally important landscapes, including the New Forest and the South Downs.
Councillor Tree declared an interest in his role as Deputy Leader of East Hampshire District Council and a county council appointee of the South Downs National Park Authority.
Councillor Davies declared an interest as a member of the Wild Trout Trust and the Anglers’ Conservation Association.
Members spoke in favour of the motion, citing the importance of conserving biodiversity, protecting dark skies, supporting residents’ wellbeing, and ensuring that planning decisions continued to respect the county’s unique environmental character. The motion received strong support across the chamber and was carried unanimously.
RESOLVED:
This Council resolves to:
1. Urge the Government to maintain strong legal protection for National Parks and AONBs (now known as National Landscapes);
2. Support the implementation of the Landscapes Review recommendations, where appropriate, to strengthen the role of protected landscapes in nature recovery and public access; and
3. Continue to work to promote and protect Hampshire’s unique natural heritage.
Councillor Tree declared an interest in his role as Deputy Leader of East Hampshire District Council and a county council appointee of the South Downs National Park Authority.
Councillor Davies declared an interest as a member of the Wild Trout Trust and the Anglers’ Conservation Association.
Members spoke in favour of the motion, citing the importance of conserving biodiversity, protecting dark skies, supporting residents’ wellbeing, and ensuring that planning decisions continued to respect the county’s unique environmental character. The motion received strong support across the chamber and was carried unanimously.
RESOLVED:
This Council resolves to:
1. Urge the Government to maintain strong legal protection for National Parks and AONBs (now known as National Landscapes);
2. Support the implementation of the Landscapes Review recommendations, where appropriate, to strengthen the role of protected landscapes in nature recovery and public access; and
3. Continue to work to promote and protect Hampshire’s unique natural heritage.
1
Apologies for Absence
To receive any apologies for absence.
Minutes
Apologies were received from Councillors Prad Bains, Ryan Brent, Joanne Burton, Peter Chegwyn, Marge Harvey, Edward Heron, Adam Jackman, Mark Kemp-Gee, Arun Mummalaneni, Phil North, Sarah Pankhurst, Neville Penman, Roger Price and Jacky Tustain, and from Honorary Alderman Robin McIntosh.
2
Declarations of Interest
All Members who believe they have a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest in any matter to be considered at the meeting must declare that interest and, having regard to Part 3 Paragraph 1.5 of the County Council's Members’ Code of Conduct, leave the meeting while the matter is discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with Paragraph 1.6 of the Code. Furthermore all Members with a Personal Interest in a matter being considered at the meeting should consider, having regard to Part 5, Paragraph 4 of the Code, whether such interest should be declared, and having regard to Part 5, Paragraph 5 of the Code, consider whether it is appropriate to leave the meeting while the matter is discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with the Code.
Minutes
Members were mindful that where they believed they had a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest in any matter considered at the meeting they must declare that interest at the time of the relevant debate and, having regard to the circumstances described in Part 3, Paragraph 1.5 of the County Council's Members' Code of Conduct, leave the meeting while the matter was discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with Paragraph 1.6 of the Code. Furthermore, Members were mindful that where they believed they had a Non-Pecuniary interest in a matter being considered at the meeting they considered whether such interest should be declared, and having regard to Part 5, Paragraph 5 of the Code, considered whether it was appropriate to leave the meeting whilst the matter was discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with the Code.
3
Minutes
To confirm the Minutes of the Extraordinary meeting held on 24 September and the Ordinary meeting held on 2 October 2025.
Attachments:
- Document Minutes of Previous Meeting 19 Nov 2025
- Document Minutes of Extraordinary County Council - 24 September 2025 19 Nov 2025
Minutes
The Minutes of the Extraordinary meeting held on 24 September 2025 and the Ordinary meeting held on 2 October 2025 were agreed as a correct record.
4
Deputations
To receive any deputations in accordance with Standing Order 12.
Minutes
The following deputations was received in accordance with Standing Order 12:
Parking meters in Lymington High Street.
The Executive Member for Highways and Waste responded, thanking the deputees, and explained that the county council was working evaluate the impact of parking charges to inform any required changes.
Councillor Kendal declared a personal interest as Chairman of Oakhaven Hospice Trust which owned three charity shops in the High Street in Lymington.
Parking meters in Lymington High Street.
The Executive Member for Highways and Waste responded, thanking the deputees, and explained that the county council was working evaluate the impact of parking charges to inform any required changes.
Councillor Kendal declared a personal interest as Chairman of Oakhaven Hospice Trust which owned three charity shops in the High Street in Lymington.
5
Chairman's Announcements
To receive such announcements as the Chairman may wish to make to the Council.
Minutes
The Chairman made the following announcements:
Emsworth House, the County Council’s residential and nursing care home in Havant, following a recent Care Quality Commission inspection had been found to be a GOOD service in all five domains. On behalf of the County Council, he congratulated the Registered Manager, and the management and staff team at Emsworth House and thanked the wider Adults' Health and Care directorate for their support.
Over the past few months, on your behalf of the County Council he had visited the Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub in Fareham, The Law Sunday service at Winchester Cathedral, the unveiling of the Jane Austen statue in Cathedral Close and the service marking the 250th Anniversary of her birth; and celebrated the 30th Anniversary of the Hilliers Gardens’ Herbarium.
He attended the Remembrance Service at Winchester Cathedral and Hampshire's own Act of Remembrance on 11 November outside the Great Hall. There was a very good attendance from County Council staff and Councillors.
Among other events, he had also attended Solent Mind's Annual Celebration Event, Trinity Winchester's AGM and the Beaulieu Estate Dinner.
Emsworth House, the County Council’s residential and nursing care home in Havant, following a recent Care Quality Commission inspection had been found to be a GOOD service in all five domains. On behalf of the County Council, he congratulated the Registered Manager, and the management and staff team at Emsworth House and thanked the wider Adults' Health and Care directorate for their support.
Over the past few months, on your behalf of the County Council he had visited the Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub in Fareham, The Law Sunday service at Winchester Cathedral, the unveiling of the Jane Austen statue in Cathedral Close and the service marking the 250th Anniversary of her birth; and celebrated the 30th Anniversary of the Hilliers Gardens’ Herbarium.
He attended the Remembrance Service at Winchester Cathedral and Hampshire's own Act of Remembrance on 11 November outside the Great Hall. There was a very good attendance from County Council staff and Councillors.
Among other events, he had also attended Solent Mind's Annual Celebration Event, Trinity Winchester's AGM and the Beaulieu Estate Dinner.
6
Leader's Report
To receive such reports as the Leader of the Council may wish to bring before the Council.
Minutes
The Leader began by reflected on the national Budget announced the previous day, emphasising that the implications for Hampshire were expected to be challenging. He highlighted the pressures arising from increased government spending on benefits, alongside measures such as additional council tax for high-value properties, which would not result in additional funding for the County Council. He outlined the continuing impact of inflation, rises in the National Living Wage, and National Insurance contributions, particularly in the care sector, which had placed significant strain on the authority’s finances.
Turning to Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND), the Leader noted the substantial uncertainty surrounding future government funding and the ongoing increase in demand for Education, Health and Care Plans. He expressed concern about the Dedicated Schools Grant deficit, with no clear plan from central government on how this would be addressed.
The Leader reported on the ongoing local government reorganisation consultation, explaining that the Government would ultimately decide the future structure for Hampshire. He encouraged Members to respond to the consultation and to maintain constructive dialogue, noting the importance of mutual respect and collaboration during this period of significant change.
He also highlighted progress with the Local Nature Recovery Strategy, which was due to be launched on 8 December. The Leader commended officers and partners for their work in securing a strong and ambitious plan, noting that it aimed to protect and enhance Hampshire’s natural environment. Finally, he marked National Care Leavers Month by detailing the Council’s responsibilities as a corporate parent and outlining the support available to more than 2,800 care-experienced young people across the county, including personal advisers, pathway plans, and grants to support independent living.
Turning to Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND), the Leader noted the substantial uncertainty surrounding future government funding and the ongoing increase in demand for Education, Health and Care Plans. He expressed concern about the Dedicated Schools Grant deficit, with no clear plan from central government on how this would be addressed.
The Leader reported on the ongoing local government reorganisation consultation, explaining that the Government would ultimately decide the future structure for Hampshire. He encouraged Members to respond to the consultation and to maintain constructive dialogue, noting the importance of mutual respect and collaboration during this period of significant change.
He also highlighted progress with the Local Nature Recovery Strategy, which was due to be launched on 8 December. The Leader commended officers and partners for their work in securing a strong and ambitious plan, noting that it aimed to protect and enhance Hampshire’s natural environment. Finally, he marked National Care Leavers Month by detailing the Council’s responsibilities as a corporate parent and outlining the support available to more than 2,800 care-experienced young people across the county, including personal advisers, pathway plans, and grants to support independent living.
7
Questions under Standing Order 16.1.1
To deal with questions pursuant to Standing Order 16.1.1. Where a member has submitted more than one question, their second and subsequent questions will not be answered until all members’ first questions have been dealt with.
Attachments:
- Document Item 7 - Questions 19 Nov 2025
Minutes
Executive Members responded to questions submitted, as published, in accordance with Standing Order 16.1.1.
8
Proportionality and Appointments
To consider a report of the Chief Executive regarding the proportionality of the County Council and to make any Member appointments or alterations as required to the membership of committees and standing panels of the County Council, to statutory joint committees, to other proportional bodies the County Council is represented on, or to any other bodies which are not subject to proportionality rules.
Attachments:
- Document Item 8 - Proportionality and Appointments 19 Nov 2025
Minutes
Prior to this item being considered the Chairman confirmed that the report was published after the main agenda and was therefore considered as an urgent item due to the need for the Council to approve its proportionality table and make the required appointments.
The Council considered and agreed the report of the Chief Executive as presented by the Leader of the Council.
RESOLVED:
That the County Council:
a) Approves the Proportionality table at Appendix 1 to the report.
b) Approves the appointments set out in Section 3 of the report.
The Council considered and agreed the report of the Chief Executive as presented by the Leader of the Council.
RESOLVED:
That the County Council:
a) Approves the Proportionality table at Appendix 1 to the report.
b) Approves the appointments set out in Section 3 of the report.
9
Medium Term Financial Position - Update
To consider a report of the Cabinet on the Medium Term Financial Strategy forecast for the next two financial years and seeking approval for changes to the capital programme and changes to reserves and reserves transfers.
Attachments:
- Document Part I Report 19 Nov 2025
- Document MTFS Main Report 19 Nov 2025
Minutes
The Council considered a report of the Cabinet on the Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) forecast for the next two financial years. In presenting the report, the Deputy Leader outlined the most recent financial data, the scale of projected pressures, and the potential impact of forthcoming Government settlements. She highlighted that since 2008 the Council had delivered more than £734 million of savings, including £94 million in the current year, reflecting disciplined cost control and service transformation.
Members were advised that in-year performance had resulted in savings of £32.4 million, reducing the planned draw on reserves from £64.9 million to £32.5 million. Despite these efficiencies, demand-led pressures, particularly within adult social care and SEND, continued to grow and outstrip funding from government. The projected budget gap for 2026/27 stood at £143 million, with further increases expected in subsequent years.
During questions, Members queried exceptional financial support (EFS), the implications of the fair funding review, and the potential impact of cancelling or delaying certain capital schemes. The Deputy Leader emphasised that the Council was not seeking a capital lump sum and continued to press Government for structural reform of SEND and social care funding. Clarification was provided that many capital programme changes reflected the release of surplus funds due to completion of schemes or switching to reflect receipt of external funds, rather than cancellations of schemes.
During the debate, Members recognised the seriousness of the financial pressures set out in the MTFS, noting that rising demand in adult social care and SEND, combined with inflationary and national policy pressures, had contributed to the projected £143 million budget gap for 2026/27. Some Members reflected on the long?term impact of past funding decisions, including historic council tax freezes, while others emphasised that these were supported cross?party at the time and accompanied by Government grant. Concerns were also expressed about the likely further reduction in funding arising from the fair funding review and the increasing number of upper?tier authorities needing exceptional financial support.
Members sought clarity on proposed capital programme changes, with particular concern about the implications of removing or deferring schemes. It was noted during the debate that many adjustments related to completed schemes releasing surplus funding or to routine funding switches rather than cancellations. Other Members highlighted the demographic pressures facing Hampshire, especially the growing number of residents aged over 85, and stressed the importance of avoiding short?term measures that would transfer pressures to any future local government structure.
In closing the debate, the Leader acknowledged Members’ concerns and reiterated that Hampshire continued to demonstrate strong financial management, shown by significant in?year savings and a reduced draw on reserves. He confirmed that the Council would continue pressing Government for reforms to social care and SEND funding, which he emphasised were essential to long?term sustainability.
RESOLVED:
That the County Council:
a) Approves the changes to the capital programme set out in Section K and Appendix 2.
b) Approves the changes to reserves and reserves transfers set out in Section K.
Members were advised that in-year performance had resulted in savings of £32.4 million, reducing the planned draw on reserves from £64.9 million to £32.5 million. Despite these efficiencies, demand-led pressures, particularly within adult social care and SEND, continued to grow and outstrip funding from government. The projected budget gap for 2026/27 stood at £143 million, with further increases expected in subsequent years.
During questions, Members queried exceptional financial support (EFS), the implications of the fair funding review, and the potential impact of cancelling or delaying certain capital schemes. The Deputy Leader emphasised that the Council was not seeking a capital lump sum and continued to press Government for structural reform of SEND and social care funding. Clarification was provided that many capital programme changes reflected the release of surplus funds due to completion of schemes or switching to reflect receipt of external funds, rather than cancellations of schemes.
During the debate, Members recognised the seriousness of the financial pressures set out in the MTFS, noting that rising demand in adult social care and SEND, combined with inflationary and national policy pressures, had contributed to the projected £143 million budget gap for 2026/27. Some Members reflected on the long?term impact of past funding decisions, including historic council tax freezes, while others emphasised that these were supported cross?party at the time and accompanied by Government grant. Concerns were also expressed about the likely further reduction in funding arising from the fair funding review and the increasing number of upper?tier authorities needing exceptional financial support.
Members sought clarity on proposed capital programme changes, with particular concern about the implications of removing or deferring schemes. It was noted during the debate that many adjustments related to completed schemes releasing surplus funding or to routine funding switches rather than cancellations. Other Members highlighted the demographic pressures facing Hampshire, especially the growing number of residents aged over 85, and stressed the importance of avoiding short?term measures that would transfer pressures to any future local government structure.
In closing the debate, the Leader acknowledged Members’ concerns and reiterated that Hampshire continued to demonstrate strong financial management, shown by significant in?year savings and a reduced draw on reserves. He confirmed that the Council would continue pressing Government for reforms to social care and SEND funding, which he emphasised were essential to long?term sustainability.
RESOLVED:
That the County Council:
a) Approves the changes to the capital programme set out in Section K and Appendix 2.
b) Approves the changes to reserves and reserves transfers set out in Section K.
10
Your Hampshire, Today and for Tomorrow: Hampshire County Council Strategic Plan 2025 - 2028
To consider a report of the Cabinet seeking Council approval for adoption of the proposed new Strategic Plan 2025 - 2028.
Attachments:
- Document County Council Part I - Strategic Plan 2025 to 2028 19 Nov 2025
- Document Cabinet report - Strategic Plan review 2025-2028 report 19 Nov 2025
- Document Strategic Plan 2025-2028 19 Nov 2025
Minutes
The Council considered a report of the Cabinet seeking Council approval for adoption of the proposed new Strategic Plan 2025 - 2028. In introducing the report, the Leader explained that although the County Council was expected to undergo significant structural change, it remained essential to set out clear priorities and a coherent direction for the period ahead. The plan had been developed through extensive engagement with stakeholders, residents’ panels, and Council committees.
The Leader confirmed that the plan articulated the Council’s vision and guiding principles, framed around key ambitions concerning public trust, environmental stewardship, community wellbeing, and delivery of core services. A performance framework had been incorporated to ensure accountability and transparency in tracking progress.
During debate, Members welcomed the importance of setting out a clear strategic direction despite the anticipated reorganisation of local government. Several Members emphasised the value of articulating long?term ambitions that would guide both the County Council and any successor authorities. Others, however, expressed concern that the tone of the plan was overly optimistic given the Council’s significant financial pressures, and they urged that the strategy be grounded more explicitly in the realities presented in the MTFS.
Members also commented on the themes within the plan, with particular highlighting of environmental commitments and climate?related actions. Some Members stressed the need to ensure that climate priorities were fully embedded across all service areas and not treated as aspirational statements alone. Others drew attention to issues of accessibility and resident experience, noting a perceived gap between the Council’s stated ambitions and the day?to?day experience of residents in areas such as digital access and customer responsiveness.
Attention was drawn to the pledges and values underpinning the strategy. Members acknowledged the substantial engagement undertaken in developing the plan, including input from partners, residents’ panels, and the Hampshire 2050 work, and commented on the importance of maintaining transparency and ongoing review as the strategy was implemented.
RESOLVED:
That the County Council:
a) Approves the new Strategic Plan 2025 – 2028 as set out in the appendix to the appended report and that it be adopted as part of the County Council’s Policy Framework, as set out in the Constitution.
b) Agrees to a review of the Corporate Performance Assurance Framework to ensure it aligns with the new Strategic Plan and Government’s proposed Local Government Outcomes Framework.
The Leader confirmed that the plan articulated the Council’s vision and guiding principles, framed around key ambitions concerning public trust, environmental stewardship, community wellbeing, and delivery of core services. A performance framework had been incorporated to ensure accountability and transparency in tracking progress.
During debate, Members welcomed the importance of setting out a clear strategic direction despite the anticipated reorganisation of local government. Several Members emphasised the value of articulating long?term ambitions that would guide both the County Council and any successor authorities. Others, however, expressed concern that the tone of the plan was overly optimistic given the Council’s significant financial pressures, and they urged that the strategy be grounded more explicitly in the realities presented in the MTFS.
Members also commented on the themes within the plan, with particular highlighting of environmental commitments and climate?related actions. Some Members stressed the need to ensure that climate priorities were fully embedded across all service areas and not treated as aspirational statements alone. Others drew attention to issues of accessibility and resident experience, noting a perceived gap between the Council’s stated ambitions and the day?to?day experience of residents in areas such as digital access and customer responsiveness.
Attention was drawn to the pledges and values underpinning the strategy. Members acknowledged the substantial engagement undertaken in developing the plan, including input from partners, residents’ panels, and the Hampshire 2050 work, and commented on the importance of maintaining transparency and ongoing review as the strategy was implemented.
RESOLVED:
That the County Council:
a) Approves the new Strategic Plan 2025 – 2028 as set out in the appendix to the appended report and that it be adopted as part of the County Council’s Policy Framework, as set out in the Constitution.
b) Agrees to a review of the Corporate Performance Assurance Framework to ensure it aligns with the new Strategic Plan and Government’s proposed Local Government Outcomes Framework.
11
Hampshire Youth Justice Service, Youth Justice Plan 2025/26
To consider a report of the Executive Lead Member for Children’s Services seeking approval for the proposed Youth Justice Plan 2025/26.
Attachments:
- Document Part I Report 19 Nov 2025
- Document Appendix 19 Nov 2025
Minutes
The Council considered a report of the Executive Lead Member for Children’s Services on the proposed Youth Justice Plan for 2025/26. In introducing the report, the Executive Member summarised the progress made during the previous year and the challenges arising from reduced funding and increasing caseloads. The plan set out strategic aims for the forthcoming year, including maintaining high standards of intervention, supporting care-experienced young people, and improving outcomes through strengthened partnership working.
Members heard that the service was thriving despite financial pressures, with intervention caseloads increasing from 10 to 13 per officer. The plan had been scrutinised by the relevant select committee and was due to be considered by the Corporate Parenting Board. The Executive Member invited members to attend a meeting of the corporate parenting board to hear more.
RESOLVED:
That the County Council approves the Hampshire Youth Justice Service Youth Justice Plan 2025-26, as endorsed by the Executive Lead Member for Children’s Services at their Decision Day on 23 October 2025.
Members heard that the service was thriving despite financial pressures, with intervention caseloads increasing from 10 to 13 per officer. The plan had been scrutinised by the relevant select committee and was due to be considered by the Corporate Parenting Board. The Executive Member invited members to attend a meeting of the corporate parenting board to hear more.
RESOLVED:
That the County Council approves the Hampshire Youth Justice Service Youth Justice Plan 2025-26, as endorsed by the Executive Lead Member for Children’s Services at their Decision Day on 23 October 2025.
12
Notice of Motion
To consider the following Notices of Motion, submitted in accordance
with Standing Order 18.1:
a) Notice of Motion submitted by Councillor Wade, seconded by Councillor James regarding on-street parking charges:
On-Street Parking
This council notes many high street shops and businesses are struggling in the current economic climate. The numbers of empty shops on our town and village streets are rising with the resultant negative impact on their local economies.
Our communities need support to try and halt the retreating tide of movement to out of town shopping and business centers. Local people and businesses are calling for help.
This council can help to stem that tide and therefore resolves to:
Review on-street parking charges imposed by the County Council to consider their economic impact on local businesses, taking account of the desirability of protecting and even enhancing the high streets of Hampshire’s communities and how HCC can respond to local need.
b) Notice of Motion submitted by Councillor Henderson, seconded by Councillor Mocatta regarding the protection of natural landscapes.
Protecting Our National Landscapes
Hampshire is home to beautiful and nationally important landscapes, including the South Downs National Park, the New Forest National Park, the Cranborne Chase National Landscape and the North Wessex Downs National Landscape.
These landscapes play a vital role in protecting wildlife, biodiversity, combatting climate change, promoting public health and wellbeing, and sustaining local economies through tourism and sustainable land management.
The Government’s independent Landscapes Review (the ‘Glover Review’) recognised the need to strengthen protection and management of these special areas.
Continued national protection is essential if these landscapes are to thrive and continue to benefit future generations.
This Council therefore resolves to:
Urge the Government to maintain strong legal protection for National Parks and AONBs (now known as National Landscapes); Support the implementation of the Landscapes Review recommendations, where appropriate, to strengthen the role of protected landscapes in nature recovery and public access; and Continue to work to promote and protect Hampshire’s unique natural heritage.
with Standing Order 18.1:
a) Notice of Motion submitted by Councillor Wade, seconded by Councillor James regarding on-street parking charges:
On-Street Parking
This council notes many high street shops and businesses are struggling in the current economic climate. The numbers of empty shops on our town and village streets are rising with the resultant negative impact on their local economies.
Our communities need support to try and halt the retreating tide of movement to out of town shopping and business centers. Local people and businesses are calling for help.
This council can help to stem that tide and therefore resolves to:
Review on-street parking charges imposed by the County Council to consider their economic impact on local businesses, taking account of the desirability of protecting and even enhancing the high streets of Hampshire’s communities and how HCC can respond to local need.
b) Notice of Motion submitted by Councillor Henderson, seconded by Councillor Mocatta regarding the protection of natural landscapes.
Protecting Our National Landscapes
Hampshire is home to beautiful and nationally important landscapes, including the South Downs National Park, the New Forest National Park, the Cranborne Chase National Landscape and the North Wessex Downs National Landscape.
These landscapes play a vital role in protecting wildlife, biodiversity, combatting climate change, promoting public health and wellbeing, and sustaining local economies through tourism and sustainable land management.
The Government’s independent Landscapes Review (the ‘Glover Review’) recognised the need to strengthen protection and management of these special areas.
Continued national protection is essential if these landscapes are to thrive and continue to benefit future generations.
This Council therefore resolves to:
Urge the Government to maintain strong legal protection for National Parks and AONBs (now known as National Landscapes); Support the implementation of the Landscapes Review recommendations, where appropriate, to strengthen the role of protected landscapes in nature recovery and public access; and Continue to work to promote and protect Hampshire’s unique natural heritage.
Minutes
13
Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Authority
Minutes
13
HIWFRA Questions
To deal with any questions which have been submitted pursuant to Standing Order 16.3 concerning the discharge of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Authority’s functions.
Minutes
No questions had been received in accordance with Standing Order 16.3.
13
HIWFRA Report
There is no report of the Authority on this occasion.
Minutes
There was no report on this occasion as the Authority had not met since the last Council meeting. The Chairman of the Authority undertook to share a performance report with all members in due course.
Previous Meetings
Future Meetings
Join the Discussion
You need to be signed in to comment.
Sign in