Portsmouth City logo
Portsmouth City Borough Council
Councillors: 42
Wards: 14
Committees: 37
Meetings (2026): 11
Meetings (2025): 117

Meeting

Full Council - Portsmouth City

Meeting Times
Scheduled Time
Start:
Tuesday, 9th December 2025
2:00 PM
End:
Tuesday, 9th December 2025
6:00 PM
Meeting Status
Status:
Confirmed
Date:
09 Dec 2025
Location:
Council Chamber - The Guildhall
Webcast:
Available
Meeting Attendees
Councillor Dave Ashmore photo
Committee Member
Cabinet Member for Environmental Services
Councillor Dave Ashmore

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Chris Attwell photo
Committee Member
Cabinet Member for Central Services
Councillor Chris Attwell

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Kimberly Barrett photo
Committee Member
Cabinet Member for Climate Change and Greening the City
Councillor Kimberly Barrett

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Simon Bosher photo
Committee Member
Group Leader
Councillor Simon Bosher

Conservative

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Hannah Brent photo
Committee Member
Councillor Hannah Brent

Conservative

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Stuart Brown photo
Committee Member
Councillor Stuart Brown

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Peter Candlish photo
Committee Member
Cabinet Member for Transport
Councillor Peter Candlish

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Tom Coles photo
Committee Member
Councillor Tom Coles

Labour

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Raymond Dent photo
Committee Member
Councillor Raymond Dent

Portsmouth Independents Party

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Chris Dike photo
Committee Member
Councillor Chris Dike

Portsmouth Independents Party

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Jason Fazackarley photo
Committee Member
Councillor Jason Fazackarley

Liberal Democrat

Apologies

View Profile
Councillor George Fielding photo
Committee Member
Councillor George Fielding

Labour

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Graham Heaney photo
Committee Member
Deputy Group Leader
Councillor Graham Heaney

Labour

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Ian Holder photo
Committee Member
Councillor Ian Holder

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Suzy Horton photo
Committee Member
Councillor Suzy Horton

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Lee Hunt photo
Committee Member
Cabinet Member for Community Safety, Leisure & Sport
Councillor Lee Hunt

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Mark Jeffery photo
Committee Member
Councillor Mark Jeffery

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Abdul Kadir photo
Vice-Chair
Deputy Lord Mayor
Councillor Abdul Kadir

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor George Madgwick photo
Committee Member
Group Leader
Councillor George Madgwick

Portsmouth Independents Party

Apologies

View Profile
Councillor Hugh Mason photo
Committee Member
Cabinet Member for Planning Policy & City Development
Councillor Hugh Mason

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Leonie Oliver photo
Committee Member
Councillor Leonie Oliver

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Darren Sanders photo
Committee Member
Deputy Leader of the Council; Cabinet Member for Housing and Tackling Homelessness
Councillor Darren Sanders

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Asghar Shah photo
Committee Member
Councillor Asghar Shah

Labour

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Russell Simpson photo
Committee Member
Deputy Group Leader
Councillor Russell Simpson

Portsmouth Independents Party

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Judith Smyth photo
Committee Member
Councillor Judith Smyth

Labour

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Emily Strudwick photo
Committee Member
Councillor Emily Strudwick

Portsmouth Independents Party

Apologies

View Profile
Councillor Benedict Swann photo
Committee Member
Councillor Benedict Swann

Conservative

Apologies

View Profile
Councillor Mary Vallely photo
Committee Member
Councillor Mary Vallely

Labour

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Gerald Vernon-Jackson CBE photo
Chair
Lord Mayor
Councillor Gerald Vernon-Jackson CBE

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Matthew Winnington photo
Committee Member
Cabinet Member for Community Wellbeing, Health & Care
Councillor Matthew Winnington

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Nicholas Dorrington photo
Committee Member
Cabinet Member for Children, Families & Education
Councillor Nicholas Dorrington

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Rajah Ghosh photo
Committee Member
Councillor Rajah Ghosh

Labour

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Lee Tindal photo
Committee Member
Councillor Lee Tindal

Portsmouth Independents Party

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Richard Adair photo
Committee Member
Councillor Richard Adair

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Yinka Adeniran photo
Committee Member
Councillor Yinka Adeniran

Labour

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Matthew Cordy photo
Committee Member
Councillor Matthew Cordy

Portsmouth Independents Party

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Cal Corkery photo
Committee Member
Councillor Cal Corkery

Independent

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Spencer Gardner photo
Committee Member
Councillor Spencer Gardner

Conservative

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Charlotte Gerada photo
Committee Member
Group Leader
Councillor Charlotte Gerada

Labour

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Derek North photo
Committee Member
Councillor Derek North

Portsmouth Independents Party

Present, as expected

View Profile
Councillor Steve Pitt photo
Committee Member
Leader of the Council (with portfolio responsibility for Culture, Regeneration & Economic Development)
Councillor Steve Pitt

Liberal Democrat

Present, as expected

View Profile
Committee Member
Councillor Joe Standen

Present, as expected

Agenda
1 Declaration of Members' Interests
Minutes Councillor Nicholas Dorrington declared a personal interest in minute 125, notice of motion titled 'Tackling Knife Crime and Enhancing Public Safety in Portsmouth'.
2 To approve as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting held on 11 November 2025
Attachments:
Minutes It was

Proposed by Councillor Steve Pitt

Seconded by Councillor Graham Heaney

That the minutes of Council meeting held on 11 November 2025 be confirmed as a correct record.

The minutes were agreed by assent.
3 Apologies for Absence
Minutes The Lord Mayor advised that apologies for absence have been received from Councillor Jason Fazackarley, Councillor George Madgwick, Councillor Emily Strudwick and Councillor Benedict Swann.

The notice of motion titled 'Cross Border Taxi Licensing and Passenger Safety', proposed by Councillor Strudwick and seconded by Councillor Madgwick, would therefore not be put at this meeting.

Apologies for lateness had been received from Councillor Lee Tindal.
4 To receive such communications as the Lord Mayor may desire to lay before the Council
Minutes Following the Government announcement regarding the cancellation of the election of elected mayors in four of the six Devolution Priority Programme areas, including Portsmouth, the Lord Mayor advised that the item titled 'Briefing on Devolution' would not be considered at the meeting. This was because the Council was awaiting further information around the implications of the elections not being held in 2026 and how plans would need to be amended.
5 Deputations from the Public under Standing Order No 24.
Deputations by members of the public may be made on any item where a decision is going to be taken. The request should be made in writing to the contact officer (james.harris@portsmouthcc.gov.uk) by 12 noon of the working day before the meeting (so Monday 8 December 2025 for this meeting), and must include the purpose of the deputation (for example, for or against the recommendations). Email requests are accepted.
Minutes The Lord Mayor introduced those who submitted an oral deputation request.

The first was from Stacey Edmonds in respect of Minute 127

The second was from Viola Langley in respect of Minute 122

The third was from Jim Kynvyn in respect of Minute 123

The fourth was from Patrick Keefe in respect of Minute 123

The fifth was from Christopher Adeniran in respect of Minute 123

The sixth was from Jacob Short in respect of Minute 125

At the invitation of the Lord Mayor the above deputations were delivered to Council in turn.

Councillor Lee Tindal Joined the meeting during this agenda item.
6 Questions from the Public under Standing Order 25.
Minutes The Lord Mayor advised that no public questions had been received under the provisions of this Standing Order.
7 Appointments
Minutes Proposed by Councillor Steve Pitt and Seconded by Councillor Nicholas Dorrington, it was RESOLVED that Council:

AGREED:

(a) the revised proportionality of the Council and the associated allocation of seats on committees and panels as detailed on the table in paragraph 3.3 of the report;

(b) the below appointments:

(i) Licensing Committee - Councillor Jason Fazackarley, who was previously a Liberal Democrat Group appointment on the committee, to be reappointed to the committee as a Reform UK Group councillor.

(ii) Housing & Social Care Scrutiny Panel - Councillor Jason Fazackarley, previously a Liberal Democrat Group appointment on the panel, to be reappointed to the panel as a Reform UK Group councillor.

(iii) Traffic, Environment & Community Safety Scrutiny Panel - Councillor Mark Jeffery to be appointed to the Liberal Democrat Group seat on the panel.

(iv) Traffic, Environment & Community Safety Scrutiny Panel - Councillor Stuart Brown to be appointed as a Liberal Democrat Group Standing Deputy on the panel.

(v) Governance & Audit & Standards Committee - Councillor Leonie Oliver to be appointed as a Liberal Democrat Group Standing Deputy on the committee.

(vi) Scrutiny Management Panel - Councillor Leonie Oliver to be appointed as a Liberal Democrat Group Standing Deputy on the panel.

And NOTED:

(i) the reappointment of Councillor George Madgwick as the Reform UK Group Opposition Spokesperson for the Community Safety, Leisure and Sport Portfolio.

(ii) the appointment of Councillor Jason Fazackarley as the Reform UK Group Opposition Spokesperson for the Environmental Services Portfolio.
8 Treasury Management Mid-Year Review 2025/26
To receive and consider the attached report and noting recommendation from Cabinet held on 25 November 2025. The report has also been considered by the Governance & Audit & Standards Committee.
Minutes Council Agenda item 8 (Cabinet Minute 80)

Treasury Management Mid-Year Review 2025/26

The recommendations contained in minute 80 of the Cabinet meeting held on 25 November 2025 were approved unopposed.

RESOLVED that Council NOTED:

(i) That the Council's Treasury Management activities have remained within the Treasury Management Policy 2025/26 in the period up to 30 September 2025; and

(ii) The Treasury Management indicators at 30 September 2025 set out in Appendix A.
9 Protocol for determining the Main Opposition Group in the event of equal political group sizes
To receive and consider the enclosed report and recommendation arising from the from the Governance & Audit & Standards held on 24 November 2025.
Minutes Council Agenda item 9 (Governance & Audit & Standards Committee Minute 48)

The recommendations contained in minute 48 of the Governance & Audit & Standards Committee meeting held on 24 November 2025 were approved unopposed.

It was therefore RESOLVED that:

(i) Council adopts Option 4 of the report:

In the event of a tie, the main opposition group is the group which obtained the largest percentage of votes across all wards at the last regular election. Should there be a tie in the vote share at the last regular election the matter to be resolved by mutual agreement in the first instance. Failing mutual agreement, if one of the groups is the existing main opposition group, that group would occupy the position. If neither group is the existing main opposition group the matter to be resolved by a vote at Council, with no main opposition group identified in the interim; and

(ii) any resulting consequential changes to accommodate the resolution be made to the council's constitution.
10 Urgent Business - To receive and consider any urgent and important business from Members of the Cabinet in accordance with Standing Order No 26.
Minutes The Lord Mayor advised that there was no urgent business to be considered.
11 Briefing on Devolution
Council to receive a verbal briefing.
Minutes This item had been withdrawn from the agenda, as previously advised by the Lord Mayor.
12 Notices of Motion
Minutes
12 Aquind
Proposed by: Councillor Kimberly Barrett

Seconded by: Councillor Steve Pitt

The threat of the Aquind interconnector has been with Portsmouth since 2014 when the idea was first floated.

2018 saw the then Secretary of State confirm the interconnector as a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP).

Between 2014 and today, there has been and continues to be huge uncertainty with this project. So far, all political parties on all of the Councils that would be affected have been as one speaking out about this disastrous project alongside our residents. We have also seen and have supported fantastic campaigning work from the Let's Stop Aquind group here in Portsmouth and Non a Aquind in France. We stand united that this interconnector will cause devastating damage not just to Portsmouth's environment but would also see gridlock in the city, loss of recreational space and general disruption to the east side of our city and further afield.

Although a former Secretary of State (Kwasi Kwarteng) initially refused permission for the £1.35 billion Aquind interconnector project , AQUIND Ltd challenged the decision, and in January 2023, the High Court quashed Kwarteng's refusal and asked for it to be reconsidered. Since that decision, we have had 5 different Secretaries of State and, to this day, no decision has yet been made by any them. This has left the people of Portsmouth, Winchester and Havant in limbo.

This Council acknowledges that severe concerns have been raised in 2024 by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) about the potential for the project to impede naval operations in Portsmouth. It also notes that concerns have been raised around issues with national security to do with this project. This shows that there are and continues to be major problems with the proposal and that this interconnector should not be allowed to proceed.

This Council notes that a letter, jointly agreed by Let’s Stop Aquind, Non a Aquind and the Leaders of Portsmouth, Havant and Winchester Councils has been sent to the relevant ministers in both Portsmouth and France and requests that the Leader publicly shares any responses he receives.

The Council reaffirms its opposition to the Aquind interconnector project.
Minutes It was

Proposed by Councillor Kimberly Barrett

Seconded by Councillor Steve Pitt

That notice of motion (a) as set out on the agenda be adopted.

Council debated the notice of motion.

Following the vote, the notice of motion was declared CARRIED.

It was therefore RESOLVED that:

The threat of the Aquind interconnector has been with Portsmouth since 2014 when the idea was first floated.

2018 saw the then Secretary of State confirm the interconnector as a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP).

Between 2014 and today, there has been and continues to be huge uncertainty with this project. So far, all political parties on all of the Councils that would be affected have been as one speaking out about this disastrous project alongside our residents. We have also seen and have supported fantastic campaigning work from the Let's Stop Aquind group here in Portsmouth and Non a Aquind in France. We stand united that this interconnector will cause devastating damage not just to Portsmouth's environment but would also see gridlock in the city, loss of recreational space and general disruption to the east side of our city and further afield.

Although a former Secretary of State (Kwasi Kwarteng) initially refused permission for the £1.35 billion Aquind interconnector project , AQUIND Ltd challenged the decision, and in January 2023, the High Court quashed Kwarteng's refusal and asked for it to be reconsidered. Since that decision, we have had 5 different Secretaries of State and, to this day, no decision has yet been made by any them. This has left the people of Portsmouth, Winchester and Havant in limbo.

This Council acknowledges that severe concerns have been raised in 2024 by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) about the potential for the project to impede naval operations in Portsmouth. It also notes that concerns have been raised around issues with national security to do with this project. This shows that there are and continues to be major problems with the proposal and that this interconnector should not be allowed to proceed.

This Council notes that a letter, jointly agreed by Let’s Stop Aquind, Non a Aquind and the Leaders of Portsmouth, Havant and Winchester Councils has been sent to the relevant ministers in both Portsmouth and France and requests that the Leader publicly shares any responses he receives.

The Council reaffirms its opposition to the Aquind interconnector project.
12 Tackling Anti-Social Behaviour Issues in Portsmouth
Proposed by: Councillor Charlotte Gerada

Seconded by: Councillor Graham Heaney

This council notes:

i. According to Portsmouth's Community Safety Survey (CSS) 2024, the overall level of anti-social behaviour (ASB) experienced by residents has been fairly stable since 2013/14, despite a reduction in the number of incidents reported to the police.[1]

ii. ASB takes many forms, including rowdy and inconsiderate behaviour in public, loud parties and persistent noise, drunken or aggressive behaviour in public places, street drinking, misuse of loud vehicles, drug dealing/taking in public places, nudity, vandalism.

iii. ASB is one of the main issues residents, businesses and city institutions contact councillors and MPs about, with ASB hotspot areas often persisting for months and years. The issue is city-wide, with loud bike and vehicle racing in Portsdown Hill and Cosham, to issues of vandalism and ASB in many Southsea parks and high streets.

iv. Persisting ASB and vandalism is having a detrimental impact on local businesses, with many having to face the financial burden of replacing smashed windows, managing shop lifting and challenging behaviour. As a result, businesses are being forced to change their working hours, move areas or shut up shop completely.

v. Targeted intervention and collaboration does take place between the city council, police, MPs, Police and Crime Commissioner and organisations to tackle hotspots of ASB, but issues for many are still ongoing.

vi. The government’s recent investment boost to increase neighbourhood policing, to recruit 13,000 extra neighbourhood police officers and PCSOs by 2029, to restore local visible policing with a named, contactable officer for every neighbourhood. This additional resource has a focus on tackling ASB, shop-lifting and local town-centre crime. [2]

This council believes:

i. Persisting ASB hotspots are causing areas of the city to feel run down, unsafe and undesirable.

ii. That all residents have the right to feel safe and respected in their communities.

iii. Our local independent businesses are the bedrock of our communities and high streets and as a council and city, we should be doing all we can to make where they operate as safe and as welcoming as possible. ASB is bad for our local businesses and bad for the local economy.

iv. That tackling ASB requires a partnership approach that is visible, consistent, and rooted in the specific needs of each neighbourhood.

v. That prevention and early intervention are just as important as enforcement, and that education, youth engagement, and support for those at risk of offending are vital.

This council resolves to:

i. Ask the Transport, Environment and Community Safety Scrutiny Panel to review the city’s current ASB strategy, report mechanisms, and partnership working, to bring forward recommendations within six months.

ii. Request that the Cabinet Member explores the potential forthe Corporate Communications Team to improve public communication around how residents and businesses can report ASB.

iii. Work closely with Hampshire Constabulary, social landlords, local businesses and voluntary sector partners to coordinate interventions and share data more effectively.

iv. Requests that the Cabinet Member explores the potential to pilot a “Respect Portsmouth” campaign, promoting civic pride, mutual respect, and support for victims of ASB, in partnership with local schools, community groups, and businesses.

v. Request that the Cabinet Member with the responsibility for Community Safety brings a progress report to Full Council within 12 months outlining measurable outcomes and next steps.

References:

[1] Portsmouth Community Safety Survey, Portsmouth City Council, 2024: https://www.portsmouth.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/portsmouth-community-safety-survey-2024-exec-summary-aa-accessible.pdf

[2] £200 million boost to transform neighbourhood policing, Gov.uk, January 2025: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/200-million-boost-to-transform-neighbourhood-policing
Minutes It was

Proposed by Councillor Charlotte Gerada

Seconded by Councillor Graham Heaney

That notice of motion (b) as set out on the agenda be adopted.

As an amendment it was

Proposed by Councillor Steve Pitt

Seconded by Councillor Lee Hunt

Under 'This council resolves…'

To replace point 'v' with:

'Request that the Community Safety Sub-Group continues to bring an annual progress report to the Health and Wellbeing Board, outlining measurable outcomes and next steps and asks the board to refer the report on to Full Council for noting.'

And add an extra point 'vi':

'Requests that the Leader writes to the appropriate minister, acknowledging that some additional funding has already been allocated by the government to tackle ASB in high street locations but requesting additional resources are made available to local authorities, including Portsmouth, to help tackle wider ASB issues in partnership with the police and other agencies.'

As an amendment it was

Proposed by Councillor Mary Vallely

Seconded by Councillor George Fielding

Under 'This council resolves…'

Amend point i. to read:

'i. Ask the Scrutiny Management Panel to consider adding a review of the city’s current ASB strategy to the Scrutiny Work Programme.'

To delete point iv. below:

'iv. Requests that the Cabinet Member explores the potential to pilot a “Respect Portsmouth” campaign, promoting civic pride, mutual respect, and support for victims of ASB, in partnership with local schools, community groups, and businesses.'

As an amendment it was

Proposed by Councillor Simon Bosher

Seconded by Councillor Yinka Adeniran

To remove point i, under 'this council resolves…'

During debate, Councillor Mary Vallely withdrew the amendment in her name.

Following debate, the proposer of the original motion, Councillor Charlotte Gerada agreed to subsume the amendments in the names of Councillor Steve Pitt and Councillor Simon Bosher into the motion.

Following the vote, the notice of motion was declared CARRIED.

It was therefore RESOLVED that:

This council notes:

i. According to Portsmouth's Community Safety Survey (CSS) 2024, the overall level of anti-social behaviour (ASB) experienced by residents has been fairly stable since 2013/14, despite a reduction in the number of incidents reported to the police.[1]

ii. ASB takes many forms, including rowdy and inconsiderate behaviour in public, loud parties and persistent noise, drunken or aggressive behaviour in public places, street drinking, misuse of loud vehicles, drug dealing/taking in public places, nudity, vandalism.

iii. ASB is one of the main issues residents, businesses and city institutions contact councillors and MPs about, with ASB hotspot areas often persisting for months and years. The issue is city-wide, with loud bike and vehicle racing in Portsdown Hill and Cosham, to issues of vandalism and ASB in many Southsea parks and high streets.

iv. Persisting ASB and vandalism is having a detrimental impact on local businesses, with many having to face the financial burden of replacing smashed windows, managing shop lifting and challenging behaviour. As a result, businesses are being forced to change their working hours, move areas or shut up shop completely.

v. Targeted intervention and collaboration does take place between the city council, police, MPs, Police and Crime Commissioner and organisations to tackle hotspots of ASB, but issues for many are still ongoing.

vi. The government’s recent investment boost to increase neighbourhood policing, to recruit 13,000 extra neighbourhood police officers and PCSOs by 2029, to restore local visible policing with a named, contactable officer for every neighbourhood. This additional resource has a focus on tackling ASB, shop-lifting and local town-centre crime. [2]

This council believes:

i. Persisting ASB hotspots are causing areas of the city to feel run down, unsafe and undesirable.

ii. That all residents have the right to feel safe and respected in their communities.

iii. Our local independent businesses are the bedrock of our communities and high streets and as a council and city, we should be doing all we can to make where they operate as safe and as welcoming as possible. ASB is bad for our local businesses and bad for the local economy.

iv. That tackling ASB requires a partnership approach that is visible, consistent, and rooted in the specific needs of each neighbourhood.

v. That prevention and early intervention are just as important as enforcement, and that education, youth engagement, and support for those at risk of offending are vital.

This council resolves to:

i. Request that the Cabinet Member explores the potential for the Corporate Communications Team to improve public communication around how residents and businesses can report ASB.

ii. Work closely with Hampshire Constabulary, social landlords, local businesses and voluntary sector partners to coordinate interventions and share data more effectively.

iii. Request that the Cabinet Member explores the potential to pilot a “Respect Portsmouth” campaign, promoting civic pride, mutual respect, and support for victims of ASB, in partnership with local schools, community groups, and businesses.

iv. Request that the Community Safety Sub-Group continues to bring an annual progress report to the Health and Wellbeing Board, outlining measurable outcomes and next steps and asks the board to refer the report on to Full Council for noting.

v Request that the Leader writes to the appropriate minister, acknowledging that some additional funding has already been allocated by the government to tackle ASB in high street locations but requesting additional resources are made available to local authorities, including Portsmouth, to help tackle wider ASB issues in partnership with the police and other agencies.

Councillor Joe Standen left the meeting during this item.

The meeting adjourned at 16:10

The meeting reconvened at 16:31
12 Cross Border Taxi Licensing and Passenger Safety
Proposer: Councillor Emily Strudwick

Seconder: Councillor George Madgwick

The current cross border taxi and private hire licensing framework allows drivers and vehicles licensed by one local authority to operate freely in other areas of England. This has created a national situation in which councils with the weakest licensing conditions attract the highest number of licence applications, resulting in what many in the sector now describe as a “race to the bottom” in safety standards.

Some licensing authorities have relaxed or removed key safety requirements, including in-vehicle CCTV, in order to attract applications and increase revenue. In contrast, councils such as Portsmouth, Southampton and Oxford have adopted stronger safety measures including mandatory CCTV, which has been proven to reduce crime and protect both passengers and drivers.

The 2015 Casey Report into Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council identified catastrophic failures in taxi licensing and safeguarding that directly contributed to widespread child sexual exploitation. The 2023 Casey Review into the Metropolitan Police Service highlighted continuing systemic failings in the protection of women and girls, underscoring the need for stronger oversight and accountability in all public-facing services.

Local licensing teams currently have no power to take direct enforcement action against drivers licensed by other authorities, even when those drivers operate routinely within this city. This leaves local residents exposed to risk, undermines public confidence, and prevents councils from enforcing their own standards. Some local authorities have now become large-scale national licensing hubs. For example, Wolverhampton City Council licenses nearly 50,000 drivers, of whom around 96 percent live outside the city.

Council notes that:

i. The Secretary of Transport has started an inquiry into licensing of taxis and private hire vehicles and has started consultation and gathering evidence.

Council believes that:

i. Public safety must always take priority over administrative convenience or revenue generation.

ii. The current cross border system has potentiallyfailed to protect passengers, particularly women and girls, and has undermined local democratic control of licensing.

iii. The absence of consistent national standards allows unsafe practices to continue and denies the ability of councils to uphold their own safeguarding responsibilities.

iv. It is unacceptable that authorities with low safety standards can profit from issuing licences to drivers who operate in areas with higher public protection requirements.

Council therefore resolves to:

i. Write to the Secretary of State for Transport and to the Local Government Association calling for urgent national legislative reform of taxi and private hire licensing, including the measures set out below:

· Introduction of a single national licensing database and identification system for all drivers and vehicles.

· Mandatory CCTV in every licensed taxi and private hire vehicle in England.

· A statutory requirement that all journeys must either start or end within the area of the licensing authority that issued the licence.

· Empowering local authorities to take direct enforcement action against any licensed vehicle operating within their boundaries, regardless of where it is licensed.

Request that the Leader of the Council writes to all Hampshire MPs and the Police and Crime Commissioner urging them to support the above reforms.

Publicly affirm this Council’s commitment to the safety of women and girls, and to ensuring that every passenger who enters a licensed vehicle in this city can do so with confidence and protection.
Minutes In the absence of the proposer and seconder, the Lord Mayor advised that this motion would not be tabled at the meeting.
12 Tackling Knife Crime and Enhancing Public Safety in Portsmouth
Proposed by: Councillor Matthew Cordy

Seconded by: Councillor Chris Dike

Portsmouth has seen a worrying rise in violent incidents involving knives in recent months. Last month, a man was seriously injured in a broad daylight stabbing on Tangier Road, following several other knife-related assaults across the city this year. Police data show Portsmouth continues to record higher rates of violent crime than both regional and national averages, and the Safer Portsmouth Partnership has identified an increase in knife-enabled offences among young people. Families and residents are rightly concerned about safety in our streets and neighbourhoods.

This Council believes:

i. Knife crime poses an urgent and unacceptable threat to our communities, and stronger action is needed to prevent further harm.

ii. Stricter sentencing for those found guilty of carrying or using knives unlawfully would act as a significant deterrent.

iii. Proactive policing, including the lawful and proportionate use of stop and search, can play an important role in keeping our streets safe, when implemented with transparency and community trust.

This Council therefore resolves to:

Write to the Home Secretary urging them to review and strengthen current legislation on knife crime, including the introduction of tougher sentencing for those convicted of carrying or using knives unlawfully.

Request that the Home Office provides additional funding and resources to Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary to support targeted operations tackling knife crime in Portsmouth.

Call on the Chief Constable of Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary, in consultation with the Police & Crime Commissioner, to consider increasing the targeted and intelligence-led use of stop and search powers in areas of Portsmouth where knife-related activity is most prevalent, ensuring such measures are carried out lawfully, proportionately, and with respect for community relations.

Support and expand community-led initiatives across Portsmouth that educate young people about the dangers of carrying knives and offer positive pathways, mentoring, and opportunities.
Minutes It was

Proposed by Councillor Matthew Cordy

Seconded by Councillor Chris Dike

That notice of motion (d) as set out on the agenda be adopted.

Council debated the notice of motion.

Following the vote, the notice of motion was declared CARRIED.

It was therefore RESOLVED that:

Portsmouth has seen a worrying rise in violent incidents involving knives in recent months. Last month, a man was seriously injured in a broad daylight stabbing on Tangier Road, following several other knife-related assaults across the city this year. Police data show Portsmouth continues to record higher rates of violent crime than both regional and national averages, and the Safer Portsmouth Partnership has identified an increase in knife-enabled offences among young people. Families and residents are rightly concerned about safety in our streets and neighbourhoods.

This Council believes:

i. Knife crime poses an urgent and unacceptable threat to our communities, and stronger action is needed to prevent further harm.

ii. Stricter sentencing for those found guilty of carrying or using knives unlawfully would act as a significant deterrent.

iii. Proactive policing, including the lawful and proportionate use of stop and search, can play an important role in keeping our streets safe, when implemented with transparency and community trust.

This Council therefore resolves to:

i. Write to the Home Secretary urging them to review and strengthen current legislation on knife crime, including the introduction of tougher sentencing for those convicted of carrying or using knives unlawfully.

ii. Request that the Home Office provides additional funding and resources to Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary to support targeted operations tackling knife crime in Portsmouth.

iii. Call on the Chief Constable of Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary, in consultation with the Police & Crime Commissioner, to consider increasing the targeted and intelligence-led use of stop and search powers in areas of Portsmouth where knife-related activity is most prevalent, ensuring such measures are carried out lawfully, proportionately, and with respect for community relations.

iv. Support and expand community-led initiatives across Portsmouth that educate young people about the dangers of carrying knives and offer positive pathways, mentoring, and opportunities.

Councillor Chris Attwell, Councillor Abdul Kadir and Councillor Russell Simpson left the meeting during this agenda item.
12 Local Government Reorganisation
Proposed by: Councillor Steve Pitt

Seconded by: Councillor Darren Sanders

The Government has forced councils, including Portsmouth, to put in plans for Local Government Reorganisation.

These plans were not in the Labour party's 2024 election manifesto.

The proposals are being pushed forward by government without a local referendum.

When consulted by the Council, 82% of residents in Portsmouth said they wanted Portsmouth to stay on its own.

All the options being consulted on by the Government ignore the views of the people of Portsmouth.

All the options in the Government's consultation force Portsmouth to merge with other councils. This council condemns the contempt shown for the people of Portsmouth's views by this Government.

Evidence gathered by consultants KPMG, acting on behalf of 11 councils in Hampshire, including Portsmouth, shows that all the options would force Portsmouth council tax payers to shoulder a significant proportion of the large deficit in the revenue budget of Hampshire County Council, which will almost inevitably lead to tax rises and / or cuts to services in Portsmouth.

Council notes that at time of writing, the Leader has still not received a response from ministers to his most recent letter of 26th September, urging the government to exclude Portsmouth from its plans to reorganise local government.

This council therefore resolves to:

i. Support the Leader of the Council to write to our two Portsmouth Labour MPs to urge them to persuade the Government to listen to the views of local residents and to get these proposals dropped and not force Local Government Reorganisation on Portsmouth.

ii. Support the Cabinet in reiterating its stance that the Government's proposals are against the wishes of local residents.

iii. Ask Cabinet to do everything it can to safeguard existing services for Portsmouth residents in the future should Local Government Reorganisation be forced upon Portsmouth and to keep Full Council updated.
Minutes It was

Proposed by Councillor Steve Pitt

Seconded by Councillor Darren Sanders

That notice of motion (e) as set out on the agenda be adopted.

Council debated the notice of motion.

Following the vote, the notice of motion was declared CARRIED.

It was therefore RESOLVED that:

The Government has forced councils, including Portsmouth, to put in plans for Local Government Reorganisation.

These plans were not in the Labour party's 2024 election manifesto.

The proposals are being pushed forward by government without a local referendum.

When consulted by the Council, 82% of residents in Portsmouth said they wanted Portsmouth to stay on its own.

All the options being consulted on by the Government ignore the views of the people of Portsmouth.

All the options in the Government's consultation force Portsmouth to merge with other councils. This council condemns the contempt shown for the people of Portsmouth's views by this Government.

Evidence gathered by consultants KPMG, acting on behalf of 11 councils in Hampshire, including Portsmouth, shows that all the options would force Portsmouth council tax payers to shoulder a significant proportion of the large deficit in the revenue budget of Hampshire County Council, which will almost inevitably lead to tax rises and / or cuts to services in Portsmouth.

Council notes that at time of writing, the Leader has still not received a response from ministers to his most recent letter of 26th September, urging the government to exclude Portsmouth from its plans to reorganise local government.

This council therefore resolves to:

i. Support the Leader of the Council to write to our two Portsmouth Labour MPs to urge them to persuade the Government to listen to the views of local residents and to get these proposals dropped and not force Local Government Reorganisation on Portsmouth.

ii. Support the Cabinet in reiterating its stance that the Government's proposals are against the wishes of local residents.

iii. Ask Cabinet to do everything it can to safeguard existing services for Portsmouth residents in the future should Local Government Reorganisation be forced upon Portsmouth and to keep Full Council updated.
12 Improving Pedestrian Safety on Portsdown Hill Road
Proposed by: Councillor Simon Bosher

Seconded by: Councillor Spencer Gardner

Council notes:

The significant community concern raised by local parents, residents and local councillors regarding pedestrian safety on Portsdown Hill Road, including the well-publicised call from local mum Stacey Edmonds (who has now collected over 1,120 petition signatures) for the installation of a safe pedestrian crossing to assist pupils at Purbrook Park and Oaklands schools, parents with pushchairs, and bus users.

That there have been several recent pedestrian-related incidents on or near Portsdown Hill Road, reinforcing the need for proactive safety measures for both residents and schoolchildren.

That the Highways and Transportation Department is currently undertaking its established assessment process, including surveys and data collection, to determine the priority and feasibility of a new pedestrian crossing in this location. Council expresses its appreciation for this ongoing work.

That ward councillors are actively working with the Police and Crime Commissioner, Donna Jones, to explore additional road-safety measures, including advocating for the installation of a speed-enforcement camera on Portsdown Hill Road as part of a wider package of improvements.

Council resolves:

To formally support residents’ calls for improved pedestrian safety measures on Portsdown Hill Road, including the installation of a safer pedestrian crossing at the most appropriate location as determined by Highways and Transportation’s assessment.

To request that the Cabinet Member for Transport continues to work closely with the Highways and Transportation Department and ward councillors to ensure this location remains under active consideration and that the results of the current survey are reported to councillors and residents as soon as practicable.

To continue joint working with the Police and Crime Commissioner and other relevant partners to secure complementary road-safety interventions, such as speed-reduction or enforcement measures, to deliver a comprehensive improvement to safety on Portsdown Hill Road.

To thank residents, including Stacey Edmonds and Kate Farley for their constructive engagement and continued commitment to improving safety for children and families in the area.
Minutes It was

Proposed by Councillor Simon Bosher

Seconded by Councillor Spencer Gardner

That notice of motion (f) as set out on the agenda be adopted.

Council debated the notice of motion.

Following the vote, the notice of motion was declared CARRIED.

It was therefore RESOLVED that:

Council notes:

i. The significant community concern raised by local parents, residents and local councillors regarding pedestrian safety on Portsdown Hill Road, including the well-publicised call from local mum Stacey Edmonds (who has now collected over 1,120 petition signatures) for the installation of a safe pedestrian crossing to assist pupils at Purbrook Park and Oaklands schools, parents with pushchairs, and bus users.

ii. That there have been several recent pedestrian-related incidents on or near Portsdown Hill Road, reinforcing the need for proactive safety measures for both residents and schoolchildren.

iii. That the Highways and Transportation Department is currently undertaking its established assessment process, including surveys and data collection, to determine the priority and feasibility of a new pedestrian crossing in this location. Council expresses its appreciation for this ongoing work.

iv. That ward councillors are actively working with the Police and Crime Commissioner, Donna Jones, to explore additional road-safety measures, including advocating for the installation of a speed-enforcement camera on Portsdown Hill Road as part of a wider package of improvements.

Council resolves:

i. To formally support residents’ calls for improved pedestrian safety measures on Portsdown Hill Road, including the installation of a safer pedestrian crossing at the most appropriate location as determined by Highways and Transportation’s assessment.

ii. To request that the Cabinet Member for Transport continues to work closely with the Highways and Transportation Department and ward councillors to ensure this location remains under active consideration and that the results of the current survey are reported to councillors and residents as soon as practicable.

iii. To continue joint working with the Police and Crime Commissioner and other relevant partners to secure complementary road-safety interventions, such as speed-reduction or enforcement measures, to deliver a comprehensive improvement to safety on Portsdown Hill Road.

iv. To thank residents, including Stacey Edmonds and Kate Farley for their constructive engagement and continued commitment to improving safety for children and families in the area.

Councillor Tom Coles left the meeting during this agenda item.
12 Investing in Early Years: Expanded Free Breakfast Clubs and Childcare for Working Families in Portsmouth
Proposed by: Councillor George Fielding

Seconded by: Councillor Charlotte Gerada

Council notes:

i. Efforts to put more money in parents’ pockets will help ease the pressure on family budgets, and this Council will support all measures which help make this happen.

ii. Childcare affordability and availability remain major barriers to employment — especially for parents in shift-based roles across the NHS, Royal Navy, retail, hospitality, care and public services.

iii. The national expansion to 30 hours of government-funded childcare a week for eligible working parents, recognising it as an important step forward in reducing the cost of childcare, improving access to work, and supporting women’s participation in the workforce.

iv. That Portsmouth’s child poverty rate stands at 21.4%, rising to 46% in Charles Dickens ward. Child poverty directly impacts school readiness, attendance, attainment, and long-term life chances. That more than 9,200 pupils (33.4%) in Portsmouth are eligible for Free School Meals (FSM), yet only 69% take them up—highlighting both poverty and structural barriers. Only 15.1% of FSM-eligible pupils in Portsmouth progress to higher education by age 19, compared to far higher rates for their non-FSM peers.

v. That over 16,000 children in Portsmouth could benefit from Government funded breakfast provision, according to local estimates, and therefore the Council will work with all primary schools to encourage participation of more schools in the next phase of Breakfast Club delivery ahead of roll-out to every primary school in England.

vi. The Government’s historic step in extending free school meal eligibility to all children in households on Universal Credit. This unprecedented step will put £500 back into families’ pockets and lift 100,000 children across England out of poverty, to break down barriers to opportunity and tackle the scar of child poverty across our country.

vii. The significant impact that scrapping the two-child limit in Universal Credit announced in the Autumn Budget will have on alleviating child poverty and putting more money in the pockets of some of Portsmouth’s most disadvantaged families.

viii. That Labour councillors, MPs and campaigners in Portsmouth have long argued for childcare reform, and therefore warmly welcomes increased investment in early years as a positive and necessary move.

Council believes:

i. That every child in Portsmouth deserves a fair start, including a nutritious breakfast and access to free, high-quality childcare, as requested in the government’s Best Start in Life strategy published in July.

ii. That universal access to free breakfast clubs avoids stigma, improves attendance and concentration, and provides a powerful tool to tackle child poverty and educational inequality.

iii. That childcare is essential public infrastructure—enabling parents to work, supporting gender equality, and boosting the local economy.

iv. That Portsmouth City Council should take proactive leadership to expand breakfast clubs, strengthen childcare provision, ensure families can access the 30 free hours, and advocate for long-term national investment.

Council resolves:

i. To welcome the recent expansion of early years provision for eligible parents and ensure Portsmouth families are fully informed about their entitlement and how to access it. This includes requesting that Corporate Communications actively promote this opportunity to council staff and the wider public through the council’s social media channels.

ii. To embed breakfast clubs and childcare expansion into Portsmouth’s Child Poverty Strategy, recognising these services as central mechanisms for reducing inequality and supporting economic opportunity.

iii. To publish an annual Childcare & Breakfast Provision Report to the Education, Children and Young People Scrutiny Panel, covering:

- The uptake of breakfast clubs;

- Free childcare capacity vs demand;

- Progress on delivering 30 free hours;

- Early-years workforce recruitment;

- Funding secured and allocated; and

- Measurable impacts on families and children
Minutes It was

Proposed by Councillor George Fielding

Seconded by Councillor Charlotte Gerada

That notice of motion (g) as set out on the agenda be adopted.

As an amendment it was

Proposed by Councillor Steve Pitt

Seconded by Councillor Suzy Horton

Under 'Council notes'

· Para v - To add the words 'continue to' after '…Council will...' in the third line.

· Para viii- To delete the word 'Labour' and add the word 'many' after 'That...' in the first line.

Under 'Council believes'

· Para iv - To add the words 'continue to' after 'That Portsmouth City Council should...' in the first line.

Under 'Council resolves'

· Para ii - To remove the word 'Child' from 'Portsmouth's Child Poverty Strategy' in the second line.

· Para iii - to replace:

'iii. To publish an annual Childcare & Breakfast Provision Report to the Education, Children and Young People Scrutiny Panel, covering:'

with:

'iii. To avoid duplication, ensure that Childcare & Breakfast Provision is a key focus of the work of the Health and Wellbeing Board and is regularly reported to cover:'

Following debate, the proposer of the original motion, Councillor George Fielding, agreed to subsume the amendment in the name of Councillor Steve Pitt into the motion.

Council voted on the substantive notice of motion, incorporating the subsumed amendment in the name of Councillor Steve Pitt.

It was therefore RESOLVED that:

Council notes:

i. Efforts to put more money in parents’ pockets will help ease the pressure on family budgets, and this Council will support all measures which help make this happen.

ii. Childcare affordability and availability remain major barriers to employment — especially for parents in shift-based roles across the NHS, Royal Navy, retail, hospitality, care and public services.

iii. The national expansion to 30 hours of government-funded childcare a week for eligible working parents, recognising it as an important step forward in reducing the cost of childcare, improving access to work, and supporting women’s participation in the workforce.

iv. That Portsmouth’s child poverty rate stands at 21.4%, rising to 46% in Charles Dickens ward. Child poverty directly impacts school readiness, attendance, attainment, and long-term life chances. That more than 9,200 pupils (33.4%) in Portsmouth are eligible for Free School Meals (FSM), yet only 69% take them up—highlighting both poverty and structural barriers. Only 15.1% of FSM-eligible pupils in Portsmouth progress to higher education by age 19, compared to far higher rates for their non-FSM peers.

v. That over 16,000 children in Portsmouth could benefit from Government funded breakfast provision, according to local estimates, and therefore the Council will continue to work with all primary schools to encourage participation of more schools in the next phase of Breakfast Club delivery ahead of roll-out to every primary school in England.

vi. The Government’s historic step in extending free school meal eligibility to all children in households on Universal Credit. This unprecedented step will put £500 back into families’ pockets and lift 100,000 children across England out of poverty, to break down barriers to opportunity and tackle the scar of child poverty across our country.

vii. The significant impact that scrapping the two-child limit in Universal Credit announced in the Autumn Budget will have on alleviating child poverty and putting more money in the pockets of some of Portsmouth’s most disadvantaged families.

viii. That many councillors, MPs and campaigners in Portsmouth have long argued for childcare reform, and therefore warmly welcomes increased investment in early years as a positive and necessary move.

Council believes:

i. That every child in Portsmouth deserves a fair start, including a nutritious breakfast and access to free, high-quality childcare, as requested in the government’s Best Start in Life strategy published in July.

ii. That universal access to free breakfast clubs avoids stigma, improves attendance and concentration, and provides a powerful tool to tackle child poverty and educational inequality.

iii. That childcare is essential public infrastructure—enabling parents to work, supporting gender equality, and boosting the local economy.

iv. That Portsmouth City Council should continue to take proactive leadership to expand breakfast clubs, strengthen childcare provision, ensure families can access the 30 free hours, and advocate for long-term national investment.

Council resolves:

i. To welcome the recent expansion of early years provision for eligible parents and ensure Portsmouth families are fully informed about their entitlement and how to access it. This includes requesting that Corporate Communications actively promote this opportunity to council staff and the wider public through the council’s social media channels.

ii. To embed breakfast clubs and childcare expansion into Portsmouth’s Poverty Strategy, recognising these services as central mechanisms for reducing inequality and supporting economic opportunity.

iii. To avoid duplication, ensure that Childcare & Breakfast Provision is a key focus of the work of the Health and Wellbeing Board and is regularly reported to cover:

- The uptake of breakfast clubs;

- Free childcare capacity vs demand;

- Progress on delivering 30 free hours;

- Early-years workforce recruitment;

- Funding secured and allocated; and

- Measurable impacts on families and children

At the conclusion of this item the Lord Mayor advised that he had to leave the meeting to attend a civic function.

In the absence of the Deputy Lord Mayor, under Standing Order 13(b) i, Council was obliged to choose a person to preside over the remainder of the meeting.

It was

Proposed by Councillor Simon Bosher

Seconded by Councillor Steve Pitt

That Councillor Hugh Mason Chair the remainder of the meeting.

Following a vote, the motion was declared CARRIED.

Councillor Richard Adair, Councillor Chris Dike and Councillor Lee Hunt left the meeting.

Council adjourned at 18:37

Council reconvened at 18:48.
13 Questions from Members under Standing Order No 17.
Attachments:
Minutes Five questions from members had been received under Standing Order No. 17.

The first question was from Councillor Simon Bosher to the Cabinet Member for Transport, Councillor Peter Candlish.

'At the Traffic and Transport Cabinet meeting held on Thursday 12th October 2023, Chaired by Cllr Vernon-Jackson, the Speed and Casualty Reduction Measures 2023/24 report recommended that Lower Farlington Road be approved £250,000 as a location for infrastructure improvements. Cllr Vernon-Jackson approved the recommendation.

It is now over two years since that decision was made and there has been very little progress and no final scheme.

Can the cabinet member provide an update on the scheme and the proposed timeline for implementation?'

In reply, the cabinet member, Councillor Peter Candlish, disagreed that there had been little progress and advised that transport schemes were complex.

Final designs on the project were however expected shortly and would be shared with ward councillors. A statutory consultation was planned for Spring 2026 and, subject to consultation outcomes and Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) approval, construction was expected to commence later in the year and be completed by the end of 2026.

In reply to a supplementary question in respect of a four month delay from the Transport department to receive an answer to a ward member enquiry about the matter, Councillor Candlish had not been party to the emails, but detailed the pressure that the department was under and that the scheme had been worked on. He believed that ward councillors had been informed in September 2025 about the changes that were required and the associated delay. He regretted the delay, but confirmed that the project was progressing.

A further supplementary question was asked querying part of the rationale given for the delay being due to plans around a seemingly unrelated temporary cycle diversion route due to the closure of part of the Langstone Coastal Path. In reply, Councillor Candlish explained that the cycle diversion route had been a more recent piece of work and whilst it had contributed to the delay, it had not been the sole cause.

The second question was from Councillor Asghar Shah to the Cabinet Member for Environmental Services, Councillor Dave Ashmore.

'Residents in Salisbury Road, Knowsley Road and Lonsdale Avenue are vulnerable to flooding. Southern Water has installed flood protection measures for some properties. Can I ask the Cabinet Member for Environmental Services, to press Southern Water to bring their proposed solutions to the flooding problems in Salisbury Road before a scrutiny panel of the Council?'

In reply, the cabinet member, Councillor Dave Ashmore, confirmed that he would be willing to undertake the request.

In reply to supplementary questions, Councillor Ashmore confirmed that there had been no flooding incidents in the area since 2022 and committed to update on any response received from Southern Water. Councillor Ashmore also confirmed that the correct process would be for the Chair of the relevant scrutiny panel to ask the Scrutiny Management Panel that the proposed topic be included on the scrutiny work programme, although a better vehicle might be for Southern Water to hold a meeting with residents on the matter.

The third question was from Councillor Judith Smyth to the Cabinet Member for Transport, Councillor Peter Candlish.

'We have become increasingly aware that transport for adults with learning disabilities has become more scarce, complicated and unreliable in recent years. Please can the cabinet member explain what PCC is doing to improve the situation?'

In reply, the cabinet member, Councillor Peter Candlish, felt that the question was very wide ranging and that it would be helpful if it could be narrowed down. He also sought clarity on who the 'we' referred to was, as no complaints about the matter had been received.

In response to a supplementary question, Councillor Candlish explained that dial-a-ride was unlikely to return, although the council was looking at ways to tackle accessibility. An option to fund improvements of the accessibility of taxis for wheelchair users had been explored, but a commercial case could not be found, even if taxis were to be offered to the trade for free. In Paulsgrove the council operated a dynamic demand responsive transport scheme, called Pompey Link. This was a bookable service which offered on demand travel with additional support for passengers with additional needs and it was hoped that this model would be a success and expanded.

Accessibility was built into the transport work that the council did and there had been bus infrastructure improvements, such as improved signage and buses that were easier to access and egress.

In response to further supplementary questions, Councillor Candlish confirmed that he would be happy to meet with carers for adults with disabilities and he would find out when the city centre bus stop that had been recently demolished would be replaced.

The fourth question was from Councillor Simon Bosher to the Cabinet Member for Transport, Councillor Peter Candlish.

'Watermead Road in Farlington is the single point of access into a housing estate and is regularly being blocked by vehicles belonging to employees in businesses located in nearby Fitzherbert Road.

Home delivery vehicles are unable to access the estate and refuse vehicles are finding it extremely difficult to collect refuse and recycling from residents.

Can the Cabinet Member for Transport provide an update of the requests for double yellow lines in Watermead Road to enable delivery and refuse collection vehicles unfettered access to the Bird Estate and the proposed timeline?'

In reply, the cabinet member, Councillor Peter Candlish, explained that this request was being progressed as part of the next 'Various Roads Traffic Regulation Order'. An indicative timetable would see this being published within MIS in mid-December, with public consultation to commence on 5 January, as it was best practice to avoid consulting over holiday periods. Subject to any unforeseen circumstances, it was likely that any objections received requiring a decision would be taken to the March Cabinet Decision Meeting.

In reply to a supplementary question around officer response times to member questions, Councillor Candlish could not respond about specific queries, but he was happy to be contacted if a response had not been received. He agreed that members were entitled to receive timely responses from officers and that the appropriate course of action if a response had not been received was to escalate to the relevant director in the first instance, followed by the Chief Executive.

The fifth question was from Councillor Simon Bosher to the Cabinet Member for Transport, Councillor Peter Candlish.

'The Portsmouth Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Strategy 2024-2034 published in July 2024 detailed that Portsmouth projected the growth in plug-in vehicle to increase from 2805 in 2023 to 22,520 by 2030.

The Labour Chancellor has announced a new mileage based excise duty on electric vehicles of 3p per mile in an attempt to raise £1.1bn.

The OBR has reported that this tax is likely to result in about 440,000 fewer electric car sales and that the yield is "uncertain".

Will the cabinet member bring forward a report on the potential impact of the Chancellor's decision on the Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Strategy?'

In reply, the cabinet member, Councillor Peter Candlish, confirmed that the council would continue to monitor the situation closely as national data on the EV market became available. Officers routinely monitored this data to inform delivery of the EVI Strategy and would continue to maintain this approach, bringing forward reports for Councillors as appropriate in what was a rapidly evolving policy environment.

In reply to a supplementary question, Councillor Candlish agreed with the stance taken by Ford and Volkswagen that this was the wrong tax at the wrong time.
Previous Meetings
Meeting

19th May 2026 Webcast

Full Council

Meeting

17th Mar 2026 Webcast

Full Council

Meeting

24th Feb 2026 Webcast

Full Council

Meeting

13th Jan 2026 Cancelled Webcast

Full Council

Meeting

9th Dec 2025 Webcast

Full Council

Meeting

11th Nov 2025 Webcast

Full Council

Meeting

14th Oct 2025 Cancelled Webcast

Full Council

Meeting

15th Jul 2025 Webcast

Full Council

Meeting

13th May 2025 Webcast

Full Council

Meeting

18th Mar 2025 Webcast

Full Council

Future Meetings
Join the Discussion

You need to be signed in to comment.

Sign in