New Forest Borough Council
Councillors:
48
Wards:
28
Committees:
14
Meetings (2026):
67
Meetings (2025):
80
Meeting
Council - New Forest
Meeting Times
Scheduled Time
Start:
Monday, 14th September 2026
6:30 PM
Monday, 14th September 2026
6:30 PM
End:
Monday, 14th September 2026
10:30 PM
Monday, 14th September 2026
10:30 PM
Meeting Status
Status:
Confirmed
Confirmed
Date:
14 Sep 2026
14 Sep 2026
Location:
Council Chamber - Appletree Court, Beaulieu Road, Lyndhurst, SO43 7PA
Council Chamber - Appletree Court, Beaulieu Road, Lyndhurst, SO43 7PA
Meeting Attendees
Officer
Strategic Director of Corporate Resources (Section 151 Officer)
Alan Bethune
In attendance
Officer
Planning Policy Infrastructure and Delivery Service Manager
Dean Brunton
In attendance
Officer
Chief Operations Officer and Deputy Chief Executive
Richard Knott
In attendance
Officer
Graham Smith
Strategic Director of Place, Operations and Sustainability
In attendance
Officer
Service Manager - Housing Maintenance Programmes and Servicing
Sophie Tuffin
In attendance
Officer
Democratic Services Officer
Joe Tyler
In attendance
Vice-Chairman
Vice-Chairman of Council
Officer
Chief Executive
Kate Ryan
In attendance
Officer
Democratic ICT Officer
Daniel Reynafarje
In attendance
Officer
Principal Democratic Services Officer
Karen Wardle
In attendance
Officer
Assistant Director - Strategy and Engagement
Matt Wisdom
In attendance
Committee Member
Leader of the Council
Agenda
0
Apologies
Apologies for absence were received from Cllrs Brand, Cullen, J Davies, Hartmann, Rippon-Swaine and Thierry.
Minutes
1
Minutes
To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 13 July 2026 as a correct record.
Attachments:
- Document Public minutes 13072026 1830 Council 04 Sep 2026
Minutes
RESOLVED:
That the minutes of the meeting held on 13 July 2026, be confirmed.
That the minutes of the meeting held on 13 July 2026, be confirmed.
2
Declarations of Interests
To note any declarations of interests made by members in connection with an agenda item. The nature of the interests must also be specified.
Members are asked to discuss any possible interests with Democratic Services prior to the meeting.
Members are asked to discuss any possible interests with Democratic Services prior to the meeting.
Minutes
There were no declarations of any disclosable pecuniary interests by Members.
3
Chairman's Announcements
Minutes
The Chairman of the Council expressed his thanks and appreciation to the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service, along with all partner agencies, for their exceptional response to the wildfire alongside the A31 in August.
The dedication, professionalism and courage shown by firefighters in challenging conditions was recognised, as well as crews having travelled many miles from other areas to provide support. This swift and coordinated action had helped to protect communities, safeguard the unique and precious environment of the New Forest, and minimise the wider impact of this significant incident.
The Chairman on behalf of the Council and residents, extended his gratitude to everyone involved, including council staff, for their tireless efforts and commitment to public safety.
Since the last Council meeting, the Chairman reported he had had the pleasure of representing the district at a number of events which included the New Forest Show and the awards launch for the New Forest Business Partnership. The Vice-Chairman had also attended the New Forest Airfields Memorial Day.
The dedication, professionalism and courage shown by firefighters in challenging conditions was recognised, as well as crews having travelled many miles from other areas to provide support. This swift and coordinated action had helped to protect communities, safeguard the unique and precious environment of the New Forest, and minimise the wider impact of this significant incident.
The Chairman on behalf of the Council and residents, extended his gratitude to everyone involved, including council staff, for their tireless efforts and commitment to public safety.
Since the last Council meeting, the Chairman reported he had had the pleasure of representing the district at a number of events which included the New Forest Show and the awards launch for the New Forest Business Partnership. The Vice-Chairman had also attended the New Forest Airfields Memorial Day.
4
Leader's Announcements
Minutes
The Leader spoke of the recent Government decision to withdraw its local government reorganisation decision for Hampshire, which marked another significant change in what had been a long and uncertain process. She acknowledged that there would be differing views on the decision as well as questions. Further details were awaited from Government on the next steps.
The Leader confirmed that the Council’s position remained unchanged. Members had been united in saying that local government reorganisation had not been sought. She continued to believe that resources were best focused on delivering services to residents, tenants, businesses and communities.
Despite this the Council had engaged constructively and prioritised representing the interests of local residents to put residents first and make the strongest possible case for the future of the district. Engagement had taken place with town and parish councils, businesses, partners and the wider community, and the following clear and consistent message was heard:
“Keep the New Forest whole. Keep the New Forest rural. Do not absorb any part of this district into an urban structure through local government reorganisation. “
The Leader clarified that this case had been made clearly and consistently to Government and was supported by Members. The Leader highlighted the depth of local feeling, through the New Forest Together petition which had received more than 30,000 signatures, and that the message sent to Government that dividing the New Forest district was unacceptable. She expressed her gratitude to all those who had contributed to the debate about future council structures.
The Leader thanked the two local Members of Parliament for their support, in particular to Sir Julian Lewis MP for the leading role he had played, to influence and champion the New Forest’s case directly with Government. She had also asked the MPs for their continued support in ensuring that the voice of the New Forest was heard as the government would consider its next steps.
The Leader reported she had written to the Secretary of State inviting her to visit the New Forest. This would be an opportunity for the Government to see first-hand the work the Council was delivering to residents and tenants, particularly through the Council’s ambitious affordable housing programme. A visit would also give the Secretary of State the opportunity to hear directly from tenants, communities, housing providers, developers and other local stakeholders as well as see that the New Forest was more than an administrative boundary. The connection between the landscape, communities, economy, heritage and identity was highlighted and it was important that this was recognised.
Finally, the Leader echoed the thanks of the Chairman towards the emergency services and partner organisations who had worked tirelessly throughout the fire incident in the forest last month. The priority was to work with the local community and businesses to assess the damage to the environment and infrastructure and to learn lessons in order to strengthen the district’s resilience.
The Leader confirmed that the Council’s position remained unchanged. Members had been united in saying that local government reorganisation had not been sought. She continued to believe that resources were best focused on delivering services to residents, tenants, businesses and communities.
Despite this the Council had engaged constructively and prioritised representing the interests of local residents to put residents first and make the strongest possible case for the future of the district. Engagement had taken place with town and parish councils, businesses, partners and the wider community, and the following clear and consistent message was heard:
“Keep the New Forest whole. Keep the New Forest rural. Do not absorb any part of this district into an urban structure through local government reorganisation. “
The Leader clarified that this case had been made clearly and consistently to Government and was supported by Members. The Leader highlighted the depth of local feeling, through the New Forest Together petition which had received more than 30,000 signatures, and that the message sent to Government that dividing the New Forest district was unacceptable. She expressed her gratitude to all those who had contributed to the debate about future council structures.
The Leader thanked the two local Members of Parliament for their support, in particular to Sir Julian Lewis MP for the leading role he had played, to influence and champion the New Forest’s case directly with Government. She had also asked the MPs for their continued support in ensuring that the voice of the New Forest was heard as the government would consider its next steps.
The Leader reported she had written to the Secretary of State inviting her to visit the New Forest. This would be an opportunity for the Government to see first-hand the work the Council was delivering to residents and tenants, particularly through the Council’s ambitious affordable housing programme. A visit would also give the Secretary of State the opportunity to hear directly from tenants, communities, housing providers, developers and other local stakeholders as well as see that the New Forest was more than an administrative boundary. The connection between the landscape, communities, economy, heritage and identity was highlighted and it was important that this was recognised.
Finally, the Leader echoed the thanks of the Chairman towards the emergency services and partner organisations who had worked tirelessly throughout the fire incident in the forest last month. The priority was to work with the local community and businesses to assess the damage to the environment and infrastructure and to learn lessons in order to strengthen the district’s resilience.
5
Report of HR Committee - 10 September 2026
Attachments:
- Document Report of HR Committee - 10 September 2026 04 Sep 2026
Minutes
Cllr Cleary introduced the report and moved the recommendation from the HR Committee meeting held on 10 September 2026. Cllr S Davies seconded the motion.
RESOLVED:
That the following statement on Personal Relationships at Work for inclusion in the Employee / Officer Code of Conduct be approved:
The Council recognises that employees who work together may form personal friendships and, in some cases, close personal relationships. While it does not wish to interfere with these personal relationships, it is necessary for the Council to ensure that all employees behave in an appropriate and professional manner at work, at all times.
Any employee who embarks on a close personal relationship with a colleague working in the same service/team must declare the relationship to their manager. If the relationship is between a manager/supervisor and an employee whom they supervise, the relationship should be declared to the appropriate Service Manager, Assistant Director or Strategic Director as appropriate. The information declared will be recorded on the electronic personnel files of both employees and treated in strict confidence.
In order to avoid a situation in which an employee has managerial authority over another with whom they are having a close personal relationship, the Council reserves the right to elect to transfer one or both of the employees involved in the relationship to a suitable, alternative role within the Council.
RESOLVED:
That the following statement on Personal Relationships at Work for inclusion in the Employee / Officer Code of Conduct be approved:
The Council recognises that employees who work together may form personal friendships and, in some cases, close personal relationships. While it does not wish to interfere with these personal relationships, it is necessary for the Council to ensure that all employees behave in an appropriate and professional manner at work, at all times.
Any employee who embarks on a close personal relationship with a colleague working in the same service/team must declare the relationship to their manager. If the relationship is between a manager/supervisor and an employee whom they supervise, the relationship should be declared to the appropriate Service Manager, Assistant Director or Strategic Director as appropriate. The information declared will be recorded on the electronic personnel files of both employees and treated in strict confidence.
In order to avoid a situation in which an employee has managerial authority over another with whom they are having a close personal relationship, the Council reserves the right to elect to transfer one or both of the employees involved in the relationship to a suitable, alternative role within the Council.
6
Report of Cabinet - 5 August 2026
Attachments:
- Document Report of Cabinet - 5 August 2026 04 Sep 2026
- Document Appendix 1 - Local Plan 04 Sep 2026
- Document Appendix 2 - HRA Asset Management Strategy 04 Sep 2026
Minutes
PART I – ITEMS RESOLVED BY CABINET
Item 1 – Progress of existing Strategic Community Infrastructure Projects
There were no speakers.
Item 2 – Housing Landlord Tenancy Management Strategy
There were no speakers.
Item 3 - Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) – Programme Mobilisation
There were no speakers.
PART II – RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL
Item 4 - Local Plan – Programme Review and Future Approach
Cllr Tipp introduced the item and moved the recommendations. In doing so, Cllr Tipp reported that the recommendations sought approval to transition from the legacy local planning process and to begin a new Local Plan under the new planning system.
The Portfolio Holder recognised that since the work had begun on the local plan, planning policy had changed and the requirements increased. Legal advice had been sought and it was recognised that it was no longer a realistic route to submit a local plan under the legacy system by the Government deadline of 31 December 2026.
The Portfolio Holder made reference to recent Government announcement in relation Local Government Reorganisation and highlighted that this did not alter the reasons for the recommendations before Council. The responsibility of the Council to develop a new local plan was acknowledged and whatever the outcome of the LGR process, it would be necessary to have a plan which addressed the need for new housing, infrastructure and protected the environment. Cllr Tipp felt that report and its recommendations set out the most robust and deliverable approach.
During the debate, and in light of the recent LGR decision, it was suggested by a member that a letter be written to Government requesting an extension to the Local Plan legacy system in order for the Local Plan to be submitted after the 31 December 2026 deadline, using the work carried out date. This suggestion was supported by some members.
Members also recognised the importance of having a current local plan, which was strong and robust, and enabled greater protection to residents, the community and the local environment. It was also recognised that there were risks associated and the potential for challenge with the local plan is not up to date, putting the council in a more vulnerable position. It was requested that confirmation be given regarding whether the current local plan would protect the district against speculative development.
It was acknowledged that it was frustrating that the plan making process had changed and that this added greater uncertainty and complexity. The role of the planning committees was also recognised as having less ability to consider applications. It was questioned whether the current work on the plan could be used for the new local plan under the new system.
One member requested that communication to residents, the community and key stakeholders be clear and consistent, ensuring that the impacts relating to the planning process were highlighted.
The Chairman of the Local Plan Member Task and Finish Group expressed the view that the recommendations in the report should be supported, and of the significant risks to the Council with proceeding with a local plan under the legacy system. This enabled a review of the work carried out to date to be considered. The report presented to members suggested a sensible and pragmatic approach.
Cllr Tipp thanked members for their contributions in the debate and gave an assurance that the work carried out on the local plan to date would contribute to the new local plan. He acknowledged the frustration expressed by members in relation to the changes to the planning system but he did not support the suggestion of writing to Government to ask for an extension. It was recognised that other authorities in Hampshire were in the same position as the District Council and confirmed that he thought that the most sensible way forward was as per the recommendations included within the report.
RESOLVED:
That Council:
1. Approved the transition from progression of the current Local Plan for the current Plan Area under the legacy planning system to preparation under the new plan making system;
2. Agreed the Consultation Summary Statement set out in Appendix 1 as a basis to inform future plan making and response to representations received; and
3. Noted that a future report will set out a timetable for progression under the new plan-making system.
Item 5 - Housing Revenue Account – Asset Management Strategy 2026-2031
Cllr S Davies introduced the item and moved the recommendation. Cllr Cleary seconded the motion.
RESOLVED:
That Council approved the Housing Revenue Account – Asset Management Strategy 2026-2031, subject to any minor editorial amendments which were delegated to the Strategic Director, Housing and Communities.
Item 1 – Progress of existing Strategic Community Infrastructure Projects
There were no speakers.
Item 2 – Housing Landlord Tenancy Management Strategy
There were no speakers.
Item 3 - Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) – Programme Mobilisation
There were no speakers.
PART II – RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL
Item 4 - Local Plan – Programme Review and Future Approach
Cllr Tipp introduced the item and moved the recommendations. In doing so, Cllr Tipp reported that the recommendations sought approval to transition from the legacy local planning process and to begin a new Local Plan under the new planning system.
The Portfolio Holder recognised that since the work had begun on the local plan, planning policy had changed and the requirements increased. Legal advice had been sought and it was recognised that it was no longer a realistic route to submit a local plan under the legacy system by the Government deadline of 31 December 2026.
The Portfolio Holder made reference to recent Government announcement in relation Local Government Reorganisation and highlighted that this did not alter the reasons for the recommendations before Council. The responsibility of the Council to develop a new local plan was acknowledged and whatever the outcome of the LGR process, it would be necessary to have a plan which addressed the need for new housing, infrastructure and protected the environment. Cllr Tipp felt that report and its recommendations set out the most robust and deliverable approach.
During the debate, and in light of the recent LGR decision, it was suggested by a member that a letter be written to Government requesting an extension to the Local Plan legacy system in order for the Local Plan to be submitted after the 31 December 2026 deadline, using the work carried out date. This suggestion was supported by some members.
Members also recognised the importance of having a current local plan, which was strong and robust, and enabled greater protection to residents, the community and the local environment. It was also recognised that there were risks associated and the potential for challenge with the local plan is not up to date, putting the council in a more vulnerable position. It was requested that confirmation be given regarding whether the current local plan would protect the district against speculative development.
It was acknowledged that it was frustrating that the plan making process had changed and that this added greater uncertainty and complexity. The role of the planning committees was also recognised as having less ability to consider applications. It was questioned whether the current work on the plan could be used for the new local plan under the new system.
One member requested that communication to residents, the community and key stakeholders be clear and consistent, ensuring that the impacts relating to the planning process were highlighted.
The Chairman of the Local Plan Member Task and Finish Group expressed the view that the recommendations in the report should be supported, and of the significant risks to the Council with proceeding with a local plan under the legacy system. This enabled a review of the work carried out to date to be considered. The report presented to members suggested a sensible and pragmatic approach.
Cllr Tipp thanked members for their contributions in the debate and gave an assurance that the work carried out on the local plan to date would contribute to the new local plan. He acknowledged the frustration expressed by members in relation to the changes to the planning system but he did not support the suggestion of writing to Government to ask for an extension. It was recognised that other authorities in Hampshire were in the same position as the District Council and confirmed that he thought that the most sensible way forward was as per the recommendations included within the report.
RESOLVED:
That Council:
1. Approved the transition from progression of the current Local Plan for the current Plan Area under the legacy planning system to preparation under the new plan making system;
2. Agreed the Consultation Summary Statement set out in Appendix 1 as a basis to inform future plan making and response to representations received; and
3. Noted that a future report will set out a timetable for progression under the new plan-making system.
Item 5 - Housing Revenue Account – Asset Management Strategy 2026-2031
Cllr S Davies introduced the item and moved the recommendation. Cllr Cleary seconded the motion.
RESOLVED:
That Council approved the Housing Revenue Account – Asset Management Strategy 2026-2031, subject to any minor editorial amendments which were delegated to the Strategic Director, Housing and Communities.
7
Report of Cabinet - 2 September 2026
Attachments:
- Document Report of Cabinet - 2 September 2026 04 Sep 2026
Minutes
ITEMS RESOLVED BY CABINET
Item 1 - Financial Monitoring Report (based on performance April – June 2026 inclusive)
There were no speakers.
Item 1 - Financial Monitoring Report (based on performance April – June 2026 inclusive)
There were no speakers.
8
Questions
To ask questions under Standing Order 22. Questions received will be published ahead of the meeting. (Members are reminded that questions must be submitted to Democratic Services by no later than 12.00 noon, Wednesday, 9 September 2026).
Attachments:
- Document Questions - 14 September 2026 04 Sep 2026
- Document Questions and replies - 14 September 2026 30 Sep 2026
Minutes
Questions were put and answered under Standing Order 22, as follows:-
· From Cllr Parker to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden, regarding the financial commitment in relation to climate emergencies.
· From Cllr Richards to the Portfolio Holder for Housing and Homelessness, Cllr S Davies, regarding upgrading council housing stock and support to households in the private sector in light of hotter summers.
· From Cllr Osborne to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden, regarding bonfires.
· From Cllr Dowd to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden, regarding education to encourage a reduction in waste.
· From Cllr Cullen to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden, regarding fly-tipping.
· From Cllr Millar to the Portfolio Holder for Planning and Economy, Cllr Tipp regarding strategic CIL expenditure.
· From Cllr A Wade to the Portfolio Holder for Planning and Economy, Cllr Tipp regarding, the planning policy framework and the planning committee.
· From Cllr M Wade to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden, regarding the new waste bins in the district.
· From Cllr Parker to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden regarding a long term strategy in relation to the climate change and nature emergency.
· From Cllr Osborne to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden, regarding the removal of the SATCol clothing banks.
· From Cllr M Clark to the Leader of the Council, Cllr Cleary regarding the LGR programme costs.
Note:
· Two questions were withdrawn at the meeting from Cllrs Rackham and M Clark.
· A copy of the full questions and replies are attached to these minutes.
· From Cllr Parker to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden, regarding the financial commitment in relation to climate emergencies.
· From Cllr Richards to the Portfolio Holder for Housing and Homelessness, Cllr S Davies, regarding upgrading council housing stock and support to households in the private sector in light of hotter summers.
· From Cllr Osborne to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden, regarding bonfires.
· From Cllr Dowd to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden, regarding education to encourage a reduction in waste.
· From Cllr Cullen to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden, regarding fly-tipping.
· From Cllr Millar to the Portfolio Holder for Planning and Economy, Cllr Tipp regarding strategic CIL expenditure.
· From Cllr A Wade to the Portfolio Holder for Planning and Economy, Cllr Tipp regarding, the planning policy framework and the planning committee.
· From Cllr M Wade to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden, regarding the new waste bins in the district.
· From Cllr Parker to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden regarding a long term strategy in relation to the climate change and nature emergency.
· From Cllr Osborne to the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Sustainability, Cllr Blunden, regarding the removal of the SATCol clothing banks.
· From Cllr M Clark to the Leader of the Council, Cllr Cleary regarding the LGR programme costs.
Note:
· Two questions were withdrawn at the meeting from Cllrs Rackham and M Clark.
· A copy of the full questions and replies are attached to these minutes.
9
Notice of Motion
In accordance with Standing Order 21, Cllr M Wade will move the following motion:-
This council recognises that Forestry England requires funding however since the introduction of car parking charges it believes based upon observation and feedback from residents the following:
· The use of Forestry England New Forest car parks by locals has reduced.
· The impact on wellbeing of New Forest District residents, who used to regularly use the Forest carparks has been negatively impacted by the reduction in visits.
· Low income and retired residents cannot afford the yearly membership and therefore no longer visit the New Forest.
· There are no Blue Badge Concessions for disabled residents.
· Unlike Forestry England forests and woodland across the country there is no local membership scheme, which gives local residents a cheaper option than national membership scheme.
Therefore, to help low income families and other New Forest District residents afford to visit the New Forest this motion proposes the following:
This Council writes to Forestry England requesting it makes available for New Forest district residents a local membership scheme for parking at a reduced rate of 50% to 75% less than the current national scheme. This will align New Forest Forestry England car parks with those Forestry England car parks across the country which provide a local membership scheme.
Cllr Millar will second the motion.
Under the provisions of Standing Order 42, the above motion, after being proposed and seconded (without speeches), should stand referred to the body within whose terms of reference the subject matter of the motions comes, or the Cabinet or such Committees or Panels that the Council may determine.
The Chairman may allow the motion to be dealt with at this meeting if they consider it urgent, convenient or conducive to the despatch of business.
This council recognises that Forestry England requires funding however since the introduction of car parking charges it believes based upon observation and feedback from residents the following:
· The use of Forestry England New Forest car parks by locals has reduced.
· The impact on wellbeing of New Forest District residents, who used to regularly use the Forest carparks has been negatively impacted by the reduction in visits.
· Low income and retired residents cannot afford the yearly membership and therefore no longer visit the New Forest.
· There are no Blue Badge Concessions for disabled residents.
· Unlike Forestry England forests and woodland across the country there is no local membership scheme, which gives local residents a cheaper option than national membership scheme.
Therefore, to help low income families and other New Forest District residents afford to visit the New Forest this motion proposes the following:
This Council writes to Forestry England requesting it makes available for New Forest district residents a local membership scheme for parking at a reduced rate of 50% to 75% less than the current national scheme. This will align New Forest Forestry England car parks with those Forestry England car parks across the country which provide a local membership scheme.
Cllr Millar will second the motion.
Under the provisions of Standing Order 42, the above motion, after being proposed and seconded (without speeches), should stand referred to the body within whose terms of reference the subject matter of the motions comes, or the Cabinet or such Committees or Panels that the Council may determine.
The Chairman may allow the motion to be dealt with at this meeting if they consider it urgent, convenient or conducive to the despatch of business.
Minutes
The Chairman announced that in accordance with Standing Order 42.2 that he would allow the motion to be dealt with at the meeting, as he considered it to be convenient to the despatch of business.
In accordance with Standing Order 21, Cllr M Wade moved the following motion:
This council recognises that Forestry England requires funding however since the introduction of car parking charges it believes based upon observation and feedback from residents the following:
· The use of Forestry England New Forest car parks by locals has reduced.
· The impact on wellbeing of New Forest District residents, who used to regularly use the Forest carparks has been negatively impacted by the reduction in visits.
· Low income and retired residents cannot afford the yearly membership and therefore no longer visit the New Forest.
· There are no Blue Badge Concessions for disabled residents.
· Unlike Forestry England forests and woodland across the country there is no local membership scheme, which gives local residents a cheaper option than national membership scheme.
Therefore, to help low income families and other New Forest District residents afford to visit the New Forest this motion proposes the following:
This Council writes to Forestry England requesting it makes available for New Forest district residents a local membership scheme for parking at a reduced rate of 50% to 75% less than the current national scheme. This will align New Forest Forestry England car parks with those Forestry England car parks across the country which provide a local membership scheme.
Cllr M Wade in presenting the motion, recognised the long history of the New Forest and explained that people had been free to roam and visit the forest with no charge until Forestry England had brought in their charging system to the car parks.
It was highlighted that the cost of living in the area was high and that for many their incomes were low. A number of statistics were provided which included; that residents 65 years old and over, represented 47.3% of the population, those with limited disabilities represented 10.2% of the population and that children up to the age of 15 represented 11.7% of the population. There was also a high proportion of children accessing free school meals in the south west region (22.1%) and these were from low income families. In addition, it was highlighted that there was an aging population in the district, areas of deprivation and many disabled residents.
Cllr M Wade also recognised that there were limited alternative transport options to visit the forest, other than by car. There were benefits of accessing the forest to embrace and enjoy the local environment and that it was good for wellbeing and mental health. He highlighted that as other costs rise such as energy prices and the cost of food, the cost of paying for parking would become a lower priority. In addition, schools often take pupils to the forest to learn about the environment and its history.
A number of forest areas had local membership schemes which were cheaper than the national membership scheme. It was recognised that Forestry England was not funded well enough by Government. The motion sought to ask Forestry England to review its decision and to introduce a local membership scheme for the New Forest. This would benefit all New Forest residents and the local community.
Cllr Millar seconded the motion. Cllr Millar addressed the motion and reported that it did not oppose the principle of charging for parking in the New Forest and recognised that there were costs associated with managing and maintaining the forest. The benefits of the new forest were highlighted, recognising that local communities had a close and unique relationship with the forest. However, it was important to ensure that the parking charges were affordable for local residents, they were not occasional visitors and there was a risk of residents being priced out of using the forest as a result of the charges. It was highlighted that Forestry England had not made any commitment to ensure that the money raised from the car parking charges would be ringfenced to the new forest and therefore local residents might not see any additional benefits in their local area. Finally, Cllr Millar reported that the motion sought to ask Forestry England to introduce fair and affordable local membership scheme, which was proportionate, whilst also enabling Forestry England to raise additional revenue.
Cllr Cleary, Leader of the Council expressed support to the motion, recognising that the New Forest was a special place and that it provided benefits to residents, particularly in terms of health and wellbeing. She encouraged members to support this motion.
A number of other members spoke in support of the motion and the benefits of the New Forest as follows:
· It supported residents in the cost of living crisis
· Improved health and wellbeing for residents, this was recognised in the District Council’s Health and Wellbeing Strategy
· The charges had had a detrimental impact on local businesses
· That a petition on stopping Forestry England from charging for parking in the New Forest had received over 11,000 signatures which demonstrated the strength of feeling towards the charges
· There had been a negative impact on other areas of open space in the district with increased usage as people had changed their behaviour due to the introduction of the parking charges
· There was poor public transport provision, and therefore residents were more likely to use their vehicles to access the forest
· Forestry England car parks had become quieter since the introduction of car parking charges
· Reducing the cost of the car parking for local residents, might not reduce the revenue for Forestry England and could encourage more residents to take advantage of a local membership scheme due to it being more affordable
· The under resourcing of Forestry England should not be paid for by local residents
· Forestry England car parking charges were higher than other nearby areas and a benchmarking exercise should be carried out
In additional to this, it was suggested that the motion could be taken further, seeking a reduction in parking costs to Blue Badge Holders and educational establishments, such as local schools and colleges in the form of a discount or permit to encourage visits to the forest. It was recognised that these groups of people might be disadvantaged with the charging system.
RESOLVED:
That the following motion be supported:
This council recognises that Forestry England requires funding however since the introduction of car parking charges it believes based upon observation and feedback from residents the following:
· The use of Forestry England New Forest car parks by locals has reduced.
· The impact on wellbeing of New Forest District residents, who used to regularly use the Forest carparks has been negatively impacted by the reduction in visits.
· Low income and retired residents cannot afford the yearly membership and therefore no longer visit the New Forest.
· There are no Blue Badge Concessions for disabled residents.
· Unlike Forestry England forests and woodland across the country there is no local membership scheme, which gives local residents a cheaper option than national membership scheme.
Therefore, to help low income families and other New Forest District residents afford to visit the New Forest this motion proposes the following:
This Council writes to Forestry England requesting it makes available for New Forest district residents a local membership scheme for parking at a reduced rate of 50% to 75% less than the current national scheme. This will align New Forest Forestry England car parks with those Forestry England car parks across the country which provide a local membership scheme.
In accordance with Standing Order 21, Cllr M Wade moved the following motion:
This council recognises that Forestry England requires funding however since the introduction of car parking charges it believes based upon observation and feedback from residents the following:
· The use of Forestry England New Forest car parks by locals has reduced.
· The impact on wellbeing of New Forest District residents, who used to regularly use the Forest carparks has been negatively impacted by the reduction in visits.
· Low income and retired residents cannot afford the yearly membership and therefore no longer visit the New Forest.
· There are no Blue Badge Concessions for disabled residents.
· Unlike Forestry England forests and woodland across the country there is no local membership scheme, which gives local residents a cheaper option than national membership scheme.
Therefore, to help low income families and other New Forest District residents afford to visit the New Forest this motion proposes the following:
This Council writes to Forestry England requesting it makes available for New Forest district residents a local membership scheme for parking at a reduced rate of 50% to 75% less than the current national scheme. This will align New Forest Forestry England car parks with those Forestry England car parks across the country which provide a local membership scheme.
Cllr M Wade in presenting the motion, recognised the long history of the New Forest and explained that people had been free to roam and visit the forest with no charge until Forestry England had brought in their charging system to the car parks.
It was highlighted that the cost of living in the area was high and that for many their incomes were low. A number of statistics were provided which included; that residents 65 years old and over, represented 47.3% of the population, those with limited disabilities represented 10.2% of the population and that children up to the age of 15 represented 11.7% of the population. There was also a high proportion of children accessing free school meals in the south west region (22.1%) and these were from low income families. In addition, it was highlighted that there was an aging population in the district, areas of deprivation and many disabled residents.
Cllr M Wade also recognised that there were limited alternative transport options to visit the forest, other than by car. There were benefits of accessing the forest to embrace and enjoy the local environment and that it was good for wellbeing and mental health. He highlighted that as other costs rise such as energy prices and the cost of food, the cost of paying for parking would become a lower priority. In addition, schools often take pupils to the forest to learn about the environment and its history.
A number of forest areas had local membership schemes which were cheaper than the national membership scheme. It was recognised that Forestry England was not funded well enough by Government. The motion sought to ask Forestry England to review its decision and to introduce a local membership scheme for the New Forest. This would benefit all New Forest residents and the local community.
Cllr Millar seconded the motion. Cllr Millar addressed the motion and reported that it did not oppose the principle of charging for parking in the New Forest and recognised that there were costs associated with managing and maintaining the forest. The benefits of the new forest were highlighted, recognising that local communities had a close and unique relationship with the forest. However, it was important to ensure that the parking charges were affordable for local residents, they were not occasional visitors and there was a risk of residents being priced out of using the forest as a result of the charges. It was highlighted that Forestry England had not made any commitment to ensure that the money raised from the car parking charges would be ringfenced to the new forest and therefore local residents might not see any additional benefits in their local area. Finally, Cllr Millar reported that the motion sought to ask Forestry England to introduce fair and affordable local membership scheme, which was proportionate, whilst also enabling Forestry England to raise additional revenue.
Cllr Cleary, Leader of the Council expressed support to the motion, recognising that the New Forest was a special place and that it provided benefits to residents, particularly in terms of health and wellbeing. She encouraged members to support this motion.
A number of other members spoke in support of the motion and the benefits of the New Forest as follows:
· It supported residents in the cost of living crisis
· Improved health and wellbeing for residents, this was recognised in the District Council’s Health and Wellbeing Strategy
· The charges had had a detrimental impact on local businesses
· That a petition on stopping Forestry England from charging for parking in the New Forest had received over 11,000 signatures which demonstrated the strength of feeling towards the charges
· There had been a negative impact on other areas of open space in the district with increased usage as people had changed their behaviour due to the introduction of the parking charges
· There was poor public transport provision, and therefore residents were more likely to use their vehicles to access the forest
· Forestry England car parks had become quieter since the introduction of car parking charges
· Reducing the cost of the car parking for local residents, might not reduce the revenue for Forestry England and could encourage more residents to take advantage of a local membership scheme due to it being more affordable
· The under resourcing of Forestry England should not be paid for by local residents
· Forestry England car parking charges were higher than other nearby areas and a benchmarking exercise should be carried out
In additional to this, it was suggested that the motion could be taken further, seeking a reduction in parking costs to Blue Badge Holders and educational establishments, such as local schools and colleges in the form of a discount or permit to encourage visits to the forest. It was recognised that these groups of people might be disadvantaged with the charging system.
RESOLVED:
That the following motion be supported:
This council recognises that Forestry England requires funding however since the introduction of car parking charges it believes based upon observation and feedback from residents the following:
· The use of Forestry England New Forest car parks by locals has reduced.
· The impact on wellbeing of New Forest District residents, who used to regularly use the Forest carparks has been negatively impacted by the reduction in visits.
· Low income and retired residents cannot afford the yearly membership and therefore no longer visit the New Forest.
· There are no Blue Badge Concessions for disabled residents.
· Unlike Forestry England forests and woodland across the country there is no local membership scheme, which gives local residents a cheaper option than national membership scheme.
Therefore, to help low income families and other New Forest District residents afford to visit the New Forest this motion proposes the following:
This Council writes to Forestry England requesting it makes available for New Forest district residents a local membership scheme for parking at a reduced rate of 50% to 75% less than the current national scheme. This will align New Forest Forestry England car parks with those Forestry England car parks across the country which provide a local membership scheme.
10
Membership of Committees and Panels
To consider any changes to the membership of Committees or Panels that might be proposed by the political groups.
Minutes
There were no changes.
11
Future Meeting Dates
Meeting dates to be agreed for 2027/2028 (Mondays at 6.30pm)
2027
17 May – AGM (Already agreed)
12 July
13 September
11 October
13 December
2028
21 February
2027
17 May – AGM (Already agreed)
12 July
13 September
11 October
13 December
2028
21 February
Minutes
RESOLVED:
That the following meeting dates for the 2027/28 municipal year, be agreed (Mondays, 6.30 pm):-
2027
17 May – AGM (Already agreed)
12 July
13 September
11 October
13 December
2028
21 February
That the following meeting dates for the 2027/28 municipal year, be agreed (Mondays, 6.30 pm):-
2027
17 May – AGM (Already agreed)
12 July
13 September
11 October
13 December
2028
21 February
12
Any Other Items Which the Chairman Decides Are Urgent
Join the Discussion
You need to be signed in to comment.
Sign in