Meeting
Audit Committee - New Forest
Scheduled Time
Friday, 26th June 2026
10:00 AM
Friday, 26th June 2026
2:00 PM
Confirmed
26 Jun 2026
Council Chamber - Appletree Court, Beaulieu Road, Lyndhurst, SO43 7PA
Alan Bethune
In attendance
Lee Ellis
Expected
Paul Whittles
In attendance
Steve Cook
Expected
Andrew Boutflower
Hampshire County Council
In attendance
Brian Byrne
Expected
Tracey Coleman
Expected
Rebecca Drummond
In attendance
Gemma Farley
Hampshire County Council
Expected
Kim Gray
In attendance
Tim Guymer
Expected
Antony Harvey
Internal Audit, HCC
In attendance
Charlotte Johnson
In attendance
Richard Knott
In attendance
Jade Lakeland
Internal Audit, HCC
In attendance
Katie Lean
External Auditor
Expected
Simon Mathers
External Auditor
In attendance
Chris Noble
In attendance
Daniel O'Rourke
Hampshire County Council
In attendance
Kate Ryan
Expected
Sophie Sajic
Expected
Ryan Stevens
In attendance
Paul Thomas
Expected
Sophie Tuffin
In attendance
Rumana Rafiq Ullah
In attendance
Josie West
Expected
Amanda Wilson
Expected
Matt Wisdom
In attendance
Syed Shah
KPMG
In attendance
Members are asked to discuss any possible interests with Democratic Services prior to the meeting.
- Document Restricted enclosure 18 Jun 2026
- Document Housing Benefit Report 18 Jun 2026
It was confirmed that the Council had minimal errors which were below the national average from other Local Authorities, and Members acknowledged the work of the Benefits Team for the positive feedback from KPMG.
RESOLVED:
That the presentation was noted.
- Document Report 18 Jun 2026
A Committee member asked who had undertaken the quality assurance on the action plan. It was confirmed that the Statutory Officer Group undertook a regular review of actions, throughout the year. There would be individual governance arrangements depending upon the action and who would also be responsible for oversight. The Project Management Office would play a key role in assurance and progress. The Assistant Director – Strategy and Engagement agreed to review how the action plan could include the methods of assurance.
The Chairman requested an update on the resolution to the collective grievances. It was confirmed that the topic was subject to external legal advice and therefore, unable to provide detail at the meeting. The Strategic Director - Corporate Resources and S151 Officer would discuss the subject, outside of the meeting, with the Chairman.
RESOLVED:
That the Audit Committee noted the assessment carried out by the Monitoring Officer and Chief Finance Officer.
- Document Report 18 Jun 2026
RESOLVED:
The Audit Committee approved the draft Annual Governance Statement for the Financial Year ended 31 March 2026.
- Document Report 18 Jun 2026
In response to a question regarding the reason for the change to the Property, Plant and Equipment Accounting Policy, it was confirmed that the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) had updated the codes and therefore the change to the Council policy was to bring it in line with the updated accounting standard.
RESOLVED:
That the Audit Committee:
1. Noted the draft Accounting Statements set out in Appendices 1 - 6 which were a summary of the Annual Financial Report that would be certified by the Responsible Financial (S151) Officer for the submission to the external auditor by the deadline of 30 June 2026; and
2. Approved changes to the Property, Plant and Equipment Accounting Policy.
- Document Report 18 Jun 2026
A Committee member asked whether the errors identified in the draft financial statement, due to the late implementation of IFRS 16, had been corrected. It was confirmed that the errors identified had been corrected as part of the audit of the previous financial statements. IFRS 16 had been implemented as a new standard and was now embedded in the Council’s processes. A recurrence of the previous issues not expected.
RESOLVED:
That the report was noted.
- Document Report 18 Jun 2026
- Document Appendix 1 18 Jun 2026
It was confirmed that firewall management and monitoring had been based on assurance controls. A remedial action plan had been put in place to address the findings, which had been completed. Discussion had taken place to arrange a further audit to ensure that the Council had met the controls and addressed the cause of the issues. In addition, to support the ICT disaster recovery and service continuity audit, a corporate exercise has been undertaken to understand the critical activities for the organisation under the business continuity work programme. The Internal Auditor had noted the capacity and capability of the business continuity plan and a significant test would be undertaken to test the Council’s disaster recovery plan, which would include other services business continuity plans.
The Chairman raised a question on the difference between the Target and Actual at the Performance Measures – Audits Delivered Within Agreed Timescales (% Year To Date). The Internal Auditor explained that it was the first year of those performance measurements being in place, with a benchmark established. The overriding performance measure was to deliver the Audit Plan.
The Chairman raised concern regarding the asset transfer procedure from the Council to Town and Parish Councils. It was requested that the Internal Auditor check that there was an agreed basis for the transfer of assets that everyone understood, as confusion had arisen.
RESOLVED:
That the report was noted.
- Document Report 18 Jun 2026
It was confirmed that in accordance with the Capital Strategy, the Council had an annual borrowing requirement of £10m, the majority of which was to fund the housing capital program. New borrowing had been undertaken and the existing loan of £4.1m had been repaid, which left a net new borrowing position of +£5.9m.
The Chairman noted at Table 7 – Non-Treasury Investments that the annual rate of return contained within the Table was based on asset values not on asset acquisition costs. He felt that it should be based on asset acquisition cost. It was confirmed that the observation was correct and would need recasting based on the original asset acquisition cost value. Therefore, the table would need to be reviewed to include an additional column and then identify the rate of return on that value, as opposed to the revised asset value.
RESOLVED:
That the Audit Committee:
1. Approved the Treasury Management Outturn Report; and
2. Noted the treasury activity in 2025/26 as laid out in the report, including compliance with both the treasury management prudential indicators and relevant legislation and guidance.
- Document Report 18 Jun 2026
RESOLVED:
That the report was noted.
- Document Report 18 Jun 2026
It was confirmed that both fraud and error was relatively low at the Council.
RESOLVED:
That the report was noted.
- Document Report 18 Jun 2026
- Document Appendix 1 18 Jun 2026
RESOLVED:
That the policy was agreed.
- Document Report 18 Jun 2026
- Document Appendix 1 18 Jun 2026
It was confirmed that during the waste rollout there had been a need to react quicky due to circumstances during the phased rollout and this had been reflected within the report. Procurement plans were underway to resolve those issues.
A Committee member asked whether an additional £1m had been spent on the waste rollout. It was confirmed that there had not been an additional £1m spend on the waste rollout, the spend was included as this had been contracted through a waiver, as opposed to a formalised tender process.
RESOLVED:
That the report was noted.
- Document Report 18 Jun 2026
That the Work Programme was approved.
Join the Discussion
You need to be signed in to comment.
Sign in